Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · S. 1846 (Introduced in Senate) — To require a review and controls on the export of items with critical capabilities to enable human rights abuses. · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Review and controls on export of items with critical capabilities to enable human rights abuses

459 words·~2 min read·/bill/117/s/1846/is/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

It is the policy of the United States to use export controls to the extent necessary to further the protection of internationally recognized human rights. Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and as appropriate thereafter, the Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Director of National Intelligence, and the heads of other Federal agencies as appropriate, shall conduct a review of items subject to controls for crime control reasons pursuant to section 742.7 of the Export Administration Regulations.
In furtherance of the policy set forth in subsection (a), not later than 60 days after completing the review required by subsection (b), the Secretary, in coordination with the heads of other Federal agencies as appropriate, shall determine whether additional export controls are needed to protect human rights, including whether— controls for crime control reasons pursuant to section 742.7 of the Export Administration Regulations should be imposed on additional items, including items with critical capabilities to enable human rights abuses involving— censorship or social control; surveillance, interception, or restriction of communications; monitoring or restricting access to or use of the internet; identification of individuals through facial or voice recognition or biometric indicators; or DNA sequencing; or end-use and end-user controls should be imposed on the export, reexport, or in-country transfer of certain items with critical capabilities to enable human rights abuses that are subject to the Export Administration Regulations if the person seeking to export, reexport, or transfer the item has knowledge, or the Secretary determines and so informs that person, that the end-user or ultimate consignee will use the item to enable human rights abuses.
Upon request from the Secretary, the head of a Federal agency shall provide full support and cooperation to the Secretary in carrying out this section. It shall be the policy of the United States to seek to secure the cooperation of other governments to impose export controls that are consistent, to the extent possible, with the controls imposed under this section. Section 1752(2)(A) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4811(2)(A) ) is amended— in clause (iv), by striking ; or and inserting a semicolon; in clause (v), by striking the period and inserting ; or ; and by adding at the end the following: serious human rights abuses. .
In this section: The terms end-user , knowledge , and ultimate consignee have the meanings given those terms in section 772.1 of the Export Administration Regulations. The terms export , Export Administration Regulations , in-country transfer , item , and reexport have the meanings given those terms in section 1742 of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801 ). The term Secretary means the Secretary of Commerce.
Connectionstraces to 2
Traces to 2 documents
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
Review and controls on export of items with critical capabilities to enable human rights abuses
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.