Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · H.R. 9480 (Introduced in House) — To ratify a Treaty between the San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe and the Navajo Nation, to provide for the creation of a... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Findings

433 words·~2 min read·/bill/117/hr/9480/ih/section-2·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The Congress finds the following: The San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe is a federally recognized Indian Tribe that has occupied its ancestral homelands in northern Arizona and southern Utah since time immemorial. The San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe was federally recognized on December 11, 1989, though the United States did not create a reservation for its exclusive benefit at that time. The Navajo Indian Reservation was originally established by the 1868 Navajo Treaty (15 Stat. 667) and expanded in Arizona and Utah by various Executive orders and Acts of Congress, including, but not limited to, Executive order of May 17, 1884;
Executive order of January 8, 1900; Public Law 72–403 , 47 Stat. 1418 (1933); and Public Law 73–352 , 48 Stat. 960 (1934). The Navajo Indian Reservation presently encompasses lands of the San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe as described in the Treaty between the Navajo Nation and the San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe. While the Diné people of the Navajo Nation and the Paiute people of the San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe have a long history as neighboring communities, the San Juan Southern Paiute people are a separate and culturally distinct Tribe residing within their ancestral lands.
The existence of the San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe within the exterior boundaries of the Navajo Indian Reservation and the lack of an exclusive reservation land base causes particular hardship for the people of the San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe, preventing the Tribe from providing adequate housing, infrastructure, healthcare, community services, and public safety for its people. The San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe and the Navajo Nation entered into a Treaty on March 18, 2000 to resolve and clarify the sovereign authority of both Tribal nations, to provide a permanent homeland for the San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe, and to resolve other matters of mutual concern.
Ratification and approval of the Treaty by Congress and the execution of the Treaty by the Secretary is necessary for the Treaty to become effective under its terms. The establishment and proclamation of the San Juan Southern Paiute Reservation as authorized in this Act only includes lands within the existing boundaries of the Navajo Indian Reservation. Once effective, the Treaty will— resolve and cause the dismissal of long-running litigation concerning certain land rights of the Navajo Nation and San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe currently pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Masayesva v.
Zah et al., No. 93–15216 (9th Cir.); and promote cooperation and harmony between the Diné and Paiute people, serving as an example of friendship and partnership between two sovereign Tribal nations.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
4 references not yet in our index
  • 15 Stat. 667
  • Pub. L. 72-403
  • Pub. L. 73-352
  • 48 Stat. 960
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
Findings
Stat.15 Stat. 667
Pub. L.Pub. L. 72-403
Pub. L.Pub. L. 73-352
Stat.48 Stat. 960
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.