Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · H.R. 536 (Introduced in House) — To reform the process for enforcing the immigration laws of the United States, and for other purposes. · Sec. 701

Sec. 701. Reconsidering and reopening immigration cases

519 words·~2 min read·/bill/117/hr/536/ih/section-701

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Attorney General— shall grant a motion to reconsider or reopen proceedings pursuant to paragraph
(6)or
(7)of section 240(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1229a(c) ) with respect to any alien who— on or after April 24, 1996— was ordered removed, deported, or excluded; or departed the United States pursuant to a grant of voluntary departure under section 240B of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1229c ) (regardless of whether or not the alien was ordered removed, deported, or excluded); and demonstrates that the alien— would not have been considered inadmissible, excludable, or deportable under the immigration laws (as defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17) )) if this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, had been in effect on the date on which such order was issued or the voluntary departure took place; or would have been eligible to apply for relief from removal, deportation, or exclusion under such laws if this Act, and the amendments made by this Act, had been in effect on the date on which such order was issued or the voluntary departure took place; and shall deem an alien who makes the demonstration under paragraph (1)(B) as not having been removed, deported, excluded, or departed, and as not having failed to depart under a voluntary departure order, for all purposes under the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.). The Attorney General may not reject or deny a motion to reconsider or reopen under subsection
(a)because— the alien did not include a copy of any previously filed application for relief; or the alien had previously filed a motion to reopen or reconsider. The deadline described in paragraphs (6)(B) and (7)(C)(i) of section 240(c) of the Immigrations and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1229a(c) ) shall not apply to a motion to reopen or reconsider under this section. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide transportation for aliens eligible for reopening or reconsideration of their proceedings under this section, at Government expense, to return to the United States for further immigration proceedings and shall admit or parole the alien into the United States. For the purpose of applications filed subsequent to reopening under this section pursuant to section 240A of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1229b ), or any other application for relief under the immigration laws (as defined in section 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17) )), removal, deportation, exclusion, or voluntary departure shall not be considered to toll any physical presence requirement. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Immigration and National Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), any denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider submitted pursuant to this section is subject to de novo judicial review in a Federal district court having jurisdiction over the applicant’s residence or, in the case of an applicant who was removed from the United States, the last known residential address of the applicant in the United States.
Connectionstraces to 4
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 701
Reconsidering and reopening immigration cases
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.