Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 117th Congress · H.R. 4350 (Engrossed in House) — To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2022 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military c... · Sec. 1624

Sec. 1624. Review of engineering and manufacturing development contract for ground-based strategic deterrent program

477 words·~2 min read·/bill/117/hr/4350/eh/section-1624·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress finds the following: In September 2020, the Air Force awarded the engineering and manufacturing development contract for the ground-based strategic deterrent program. The total development cost of the ground-based strategic deterrent program is expected to be approximately $100,000,000,000. The Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently noted that we have got to make [the ground-based strategic deterrent program] more affordable. A three-stage, solid rocket ICBM should not cost as much as the forecast says it costs for now.
After meeting with the program office at Northrop Grumman multiple times I think that program can come in significantly cheaper. It’s designed correctly. It’s a digital engineering process that should be able to build things quickly and much more effectively. . The Air Force has placed significant importance on digital engineering in achieving cost and schedule requirements with respect to the ground-based strategic deterrent program. The Secretary of the Air Force shall provide for the conduct of a review of the implementation and the execution of the engineering and manufacturing development contract for the ground-based strategic deterrent program.
The review under paragraph
(1)shall include the following: An analysis of the ability of the Air Force to implement industry best practices during the engineering and manufacturing development phase of the ground-based strategic deterrent program. A review of the challenges the Air Force faces in implementing such industry best practices. A review of the ability of the Air Force to leverage digital engineering during such engineering and manufacturing development phase. A review of any options that may be available to the Air Force to reduce cost and introduce competition within the operations and maintenance phase of the ground-based strategic deterrent program. Recommendations to improve the cost, schedule, and program management of the ground-based strategic deterrent program. The Secretary shall ensure that the review under paragraph
(1)is conducted by individuals from the public and private sector, including not fewer than two individuals— who are not employees or officers of the Department of Defense or a contractor of the Department; and who have experience outside of the defense industry. The Secretary shall provide to the individuals conducting the review under paragraph
(1)all information necessary for the review. The Secretary shall ensure that each individual who conducts the review under paragraph
(1)holds a security clearance at the appropriate level for such review. Not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the review under subsection (b)(1). The report shall be submitted in unclassified form and shall include a classified annex. Not later than 90 days after the date on which the Secretary submits the report under subsection (c), the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on implementing the recommendations contained in the review under subsection (b)(1).
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.