Sec. 1331. Combating global corruption
1,414 words·~6 min read·
/bill/117/hr/4350/eh/section-1331·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
In this section: The term corrupt actor means— any foreign person or entity that is a government official or government entity responsible for, or complicit in, an act of corruption; and any company, in which a person or entity described in subparagraph
(A)has a significant stake, which is responsible for, or complicit in, an act of corruption. The term corruption means the unlawful exercise of entrusted public power for private gain, including by bribery, nepotism, fraud, or embezzlement. The term significant corruption means corruption committed at a high level of government that has some or all of the following characteristics: Illegitimately distorts major decision-making, such as policy or resource determinations, or other fundamental functions of governance. Involves economically or socially large-scale government activities. The Secretary of State shall annually publish, on a publicly accessible website, a tiered ranking of all foreign countries. A country shall be ranked as a tier 1 country in the ranking published under paragraph
(1)if the government of such country is complying with the minimum standards set forth in section 4. A country shall be ranked as a tier 2 country in the ranking published under paragraph
(1)if the government of such country is making efforts to comply with the minimum standards set forth in section 4, but is not achieving the requisite level of compliance to be ranked as a tier 1 country. A country shall be ranked as a tier 3 country in the ranking published under paragraph
(1)if the government of such country is making de minimis or no efforts to comply with the minimum standards set forth in subsection (c). The government of a country is complying with the minimum standards for the elimination of corruption if the government— has enacted and implemented laws and established government structures, policies, and practices that prohibit corruption, including significant corruption; enforces the laws described in subparagraph
(A)by punishing any person who is found, through a fair judicial process, to have violated such laws; prescribes punishment for significant corruption that is commensurate with the punishment prescribed for serious crimes; and is making serious and sustained efforts to address corruption, including through prevention. In determining whether a government is making serious and sustained efforts to address corruption, the Secretary of State shall consider, to the extent relevant or appropriate, factors such as— whether the government of the country has criminalized corruption, investigates and prosecutes acts of corruption, and convicts and sentences persons responsible for such acts over which it has jurisdiction, including, as appropriate, incarcerating individuals convicted of such acts; whether the government of the country vigorously investigates, prosecutes, convicts, and sentences public officials who participate in or facilitate corruption, including nationals of the country who are deployed in foreign military assignments, trade delegations abroad, or other similar missions, who engage in or facilitate significant corruption; whether the government of the country has adopted measures to prevent corruption, such as measures to inform and educate the public, including potential victims, about the causes and consequences of corruption; what steps the government of the country has taken to prohibit government officials from participating in, facilitating, or condoning corruption, including the investigation, prosecution, and conviction of such officials; the extent to which the country provides access, or, as appropriate, makes adequate resources available, to civil society organizations and other institutions to combat corruption, including reporting, investigating, and monitoring; whether an independent judiciary or judicial body in the country is responsible for, and effectively capable of, deciding corruption cases impartially, on the basis of facts and in accordance with the law, without any improper restrictions, influences, inducements, pressures, threats, or interferences (direct or indirect); whether the government of the country is assisting in international investigations of transnational corruption networks and in other cooperative efforts to combat significant corruption, including, as appropriate, cooperating with the governments of other countries to extradite corrupt actors; whether the government of the country recognizes the rights of victims of corruption, ensures their access to justice, and takes steps to prevent victims from being further victimized or persecuted by corrupt actors, government officials, or others; whether the government of the country protects victims of corruption or whistleblowers from reprisal due to such persons having assisted in exposing corruption, and refrains from other discriminatory treatment of such persons; whether the government of the country is willing and able to recover and, as appropriate, return the proceeds of corruption; whether the government of the country is taking steps to implement financial transparency measures in line with the Financial Action Task Force recommendations, including due diligence and beneficial ownership transparency requirements; whether the government of the country is facilitating corruption in other countries in connection with state-directed investment, loans or grants for major infrastructure, or other initiatives; and such other information relating to corruption as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. In determining whether a government is making serious and sustained efforts to address corruption, the Secretary of State shall consider the government of a country’s compliance with the following, as relevant: The Inter-American Convention against Corruption of the Organization of American States, done at Caracas March 29, 1996. The Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions of the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development, done at Paris December 21, 1997 (commonly referred to as the Anti-Bribery Convention ). The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, done at New York November 15, 2000. The United Nations Convention against Corruption, done at New York October 31, 2003. Such other treaties, agreements, and international standards as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, should evaluate whether there are foreign persons engaged in significant corruption for the purposes of potential imposition of sanctions under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (subtitle F of title XII of Public Law 114–328 ; 22 U.S.C. 2656 note)— in all countries identified as tier 3 countries under subsection (b); or in relation to the planning or construction or any operation of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. Not later than 180 days after publishing the list required by subsection (b)(1) and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit to the committees specified in paragraph
(6)a report that includes— a list of foreign persons with respect to which the President imposed sanctions pursuant to the evaluation under paragraph (1); the dates on which such sanctions were imposed; the reasons for imposing such sanctions; and a list of all foreign persons found to have been engaged in significant corruption in relation to the planning, construction, or operation of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. Each report required by paragraph
(2)shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex. The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, may (except with respect to the list required by paragraph (2)(D)) provide a briefing to the committees specified in paragraph
(6)instead of submitting a written report required under paragraph (2), if doing so would better serve existing United States anti-corruption efforts or the national interests of the United States. The requirements under paragraphs (1)(B) and (2)(D) shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. The committees specified in this subsection are— the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Appropriations, the Committee on Financial Services, and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives. The Secretary of State shall annually designate an anti-corruption point of contact at the United States diplomatic post to each country identified as tier 2 or tier 3 under section 3, or which the Secretary otherwise determines is in need of such a point of contact. The point of contact shall be the chief of mission or the chief of mission’s designee. Each anti-corruption point of contact designated under subsection
(a)shall be responsible for enhancing coordination and promoting the implementation of a whole-of-government approach among the relevant Federal departments and agencies undertaking efforts to— promote good governance in foreign countries; and enhance the ability of such countries— to combat public corruption; and to develop and implement corruption risk assessment tools and mitigation strategies. The Secretary of State shall implement appropriate training for anti-corruption points of contact designated under paragraph (1).
Connectionstraces to 2
Traces to 2 documents
U.S. Code
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources