Sec. 9212. Clarification on Amtrak contracting out
270 words·~1 min read·
/bill/117/hr/3684/eh/section-9212A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Section 121 of the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997 ( 49 U.S.C. 24312 note; 111 Stat. 2574) is amended by striking subsection
(d)and inserting the following: Amtrak may not contract out work within the scope of work performed by an employee in a bargaining unit covered by a collective bargaining agreement entered into between Amtrak and an organization representing Amtrak employees during the period of time such employee has been laid off involuntarily if such employee— is eligible and qualified under the agreement to perform such work in accordance with the seniority of such employee; and has not been provided an opportunity to be recalled to perform such work. This section does not— supersede a prohibition or limitation on contracting out work covered by an agreement entered into between Amtrak and an organization representing Amtrak employees; or prohibit Amtrak and an organization representing Amtrak employees from entering into an agreement that allows for contracting out the work of a furloughed employee that would otherwise be prohibited under subsection (d). . Section 24320(c)(2) of title 49, United State Code, is amended— in subparagraph (C)(iii)(III) by striking and at the end; by redesignating subparagraph
(D)as subparagraph (E); and by inserting after subparagraph
(C)the following: a summary of Amtrak’s plan to meet the workforce needs of each asset category, which shall— identify any gaps in Amtrak’s workforce, including any vacancy, skill gap, or shortage of qualified personnel; summarize any action Amtrak is taking to address any such gaps; and summarize any anticipated change to the size of the Amtrak workforce and any cause for such change; and .
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
U.S. Code
1 reference not yet in our index
- 111 Stat. 2574
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources