Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · S. 867 (Introduced in Senate) — To protect students of institutions of higher education and the taxpayer investment in institutions of higher educati... · Sec. 202

Sec. 202. Prohibition on institutions limiting student legal action

159 words·~1 min read·/bill/116/s/867/is/section-202·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code, (relating to the enforcement of arbitration agreements) shall not apply to an enrollment agreement made between a student and an institution of higher education. In this section, the term institution of higher education has the meaning given such term in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002), as amended by section 101 of this Act. Section 487(a) (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)), as amended by section 101, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
The institution will not require any student to agree to, and will not enforce, any limitation or restriction (including a limitation or restriction on any available choice of applicable law, a jury trial, or venue) on the ability of a student to pursue a claim, individually or with others, against an institution in court. . Notwithstanding section 3, this section shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 202
Prohibition on institutions limiting student legal action
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.