Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · S. 820 (Engrossed in Senate) — To strengthen programs authorized under the Debbie Smith Act of 2004. · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. DNA Backlog Grant Program improvement

818 words·~4 min read·/bill/116/s/820/es/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 ( 34 U.S.C. 40701 ) is amended— in subsection (a)— in paragraph (2), by striking including and inserting prioritizing, to the extent practicable consistent with public safety considerations ; and in paragraph (8), by striking including and inserting in particular, ; in subsection (b)— in paragraph (6), by striking and at the end; in paragraph (7), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and by adding at the end the following: provide assurances that the DNA section of the laboratory to be used to conduct DNA analyses has a written policy that prioritizes the analysis of, to the extent practicable consistent with public safety considerations, samples from homicides and sexual assaults. ; in subsection (c)(3)— in subparagraph (B), by striking 2014 through 2019 and inserting 2019 through 2024 ; and in subparagraph (C), by striking 2014 through 2019 and inserting 2019 through 2024 ; in subsection (g)— by redesignating paragraph (1), (2), and
(3)as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), and adjusting the margins accordingly; by striking Not later and inserting the following: Not later ; and by adding at the end the following: Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Debbie Smith Act of 2019 — the Director of the National Institute of Justice shall— define DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction program-wide goals in clear, specific, and measurable terms; consistently document the goals defined under clause (i); and use performance measures for each goal defined under clause
(i)that fully reflect the appropriate attributes of successful performance measures according to recommendations made by the Government Accountability Office in the report entitled, DNA Evidence: DOJ Should Improve Performance Measurement and Properly Design controls for Nationwide Grant Program (GAO–19–216); and the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs shall fully establish all appropriate controls relating to conflicts of interest and to lobbying as reported by the Government Accountability Office in the report entitled, DNA Evidence: DOJ Should Improve Performance Measurement and Properly Design controls for Nationwide Grant Program (GAO–19–216). Not later than 180 days after the date on which the Comptroller General of the United States issues the 2018 report on the DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Grant Program, or 180 days after the date of enactment of the Debbie Smith Act of 2019 , whichever date is later, the Attorney General shall submit a report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives that— describes any action taken by the Department of Justice since the release of the 2018 report on the DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Grant Program to improve the DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Grant Program based on the recommendations of the Comptroller General; and includes recommendations for reforms that could enhance the effectiveness of the program in reducing the backlog of unanalyzed DNA evidence in sexual assault cases. . Not later than 180 days after the end of the third fiscal year beginning after the date of enactment of the Debbie Smith Act of 2019 , and once every 3 fiscal years thereafter through fiscal year 2025, the Comptroller General of the United States shall issue a report on the DNA analysis workloads at laboratories that participate in the Combined DNA Index System using data available from the DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction Grant Program or other sources that— describes, by year— the total number of new crime scene DNA analysis requests submitted to laboratories; the total number of crime scene DNA analysis requests analyzed including, to the extent practicable and reported separately— the number analyzed at laboratories participating in Combined DNA Index System; and the number of requests outsourced and analyzed at private laboratories; the total number of DNA profiles from crime scene evidence uploaded to the Combined DNA Index System; the total number of Combined DNA Index System hits and investigations aided resulting from DNA profiles recovered from crime scene evidence; the number of outstanding crime scene DNA analysis requests at the end of each year and the number of such outstanding requests that are older than 30 days at the end of the year; and to the extent practicable, the number of requests associated with sexual assault cases submitted to laboratories during the year and the number of such requests that are older than 30 days at the end of the year; and includes a determination as to— whether the National Institute of Justice has defined DNA Capacity Enhancement and Backlog Reduction program-wide goals as required under paragraph (2)(A); and whether the Office of Justice Programs has fully established all appropriate controls relating to conflicts of interest and to lobbying as required under paragraph (2)(B). ; and in subsection (j), by striking 2015 through 2019 and inserting 2019 through 2024 .
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
DNA Backlog Grant Program improvement
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.