Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · S. 4613 (Introduced in Senate) — To amend the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act to prevent certain automated calls and to require notice of the a... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Findings

440 words·~2 min read·/bill/116/s/4613/is/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress finds the following: The Federal Trade Commission
(FTC)has received over 9,000 comments since 2016 related to part 315 of title 16, Code of Federal Regulations (commonly known as the Contact Lens Rule ), including letters from over 100 Members of Congress. In addition, the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives have included language 7 times since 2016 urging the FTC to consider patient safety concerns or regulatory burdens in its rulemaking. The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)recorded over 1,075 contact lens-related corneal infections from 2005 to 2015, with 20 percent of those patients having permanent vision loss. Over the last 20 years, the contact lens marketplace has grown more competitive and diversified, with many new and different types of sellers. As a result, automated phone calls as a means of passive verification of contact lens prescriptions have significantly increased since Congress passed the Fairness to Contact Lens Consumers Act (P.L. 108–164) in 2003, becoming the primary method of verification used by online sellers. Outlining several concerns, the FTC in its Final Notice of Rulemaking, published in the Federal Register on August 17, 2020, stated that automated telephone calls are a commonly used method of verification. Moreover, these calls impose a cost on prescribers, and there are potential health risks to patients from incomplete and incomprehensible automated telephone requests. The FTC also acknowledged that it lacks enforcement capability related to automated calls, stating the Commission cannot reliably assess whether that call was compliant and further whether the seller has a pattern of non-compliant calls (and selling after such calls). . The FTC has repeatedly acknowledged the ambiguity created by the lack of an explicit statutory ban on automated calls as a means of verification. From 2011 to 2016, out of about 200,000,000 contact lens prescriptions written, the FTC received only 309 complaints, resulting in 45 letters to prescribers warning of potential Contact Lens Rule violations. The FTC’s 2020 Final Contact Lens Rule addresses prescription release concerns by significantly increasing the paperwork burden on optometrists and ophthalmologists, requiring that eye care professionals keep a new record signed by the patient (or digitally agreed to) confirming the receipt of each of the 45,000,000 contact lens prescriptions written each year. The vast majority of optometrists operate small businesses, with over 80 percent of practices having less than 10 employees. The paperwork burden in the FTC’s 2020 Final Contact Lens Rule is estimated to cost each practice between $10,000 and $18,000 a year. The State of California requires prescribers to post a sign informing patients of their right to receive their prescription.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.