Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · S. 4406 (Introduced in Senate) — To amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act to fully protect the safety of children and the envi... · Sec. 4

Sec. 4. Emergency review of pesticides banned in other nations

420 words·~2 min read·/bill/116/s/4406/is/section-4·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 6 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act ( 7 U.S.C. 136d ) is amended by adding at the end the following: The Administrator shall immediately suspend the registration of any active ingredient or pesticide product that is— banned or otherwise prohibited from entering the market by the European Union, 1 or more countries in the European Union, or Canada; and registered for use within the United States. The Administrator shall complete an expedited review of the justification and rationale for the ban of a pesticide by the European Union or a country described in paragraph (1)(A).
In carrying out an expedited review with respect to each pesticide under subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall provide notice and an opportunity for public comment. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including subsection (b), if the Administrator determines after a review under paragraph
(2)that the pesticide under review may be dangerous in accordance with subparagraph (B), the registration that is suspended shall be canceled not later than 2 years after the date of completion of the review. The Administrator shall determine that a pesticide under review under paragraph
(2)may be dangerous if substantial information indicates that the pesticide may— be carcinogenic; be acutely toxic; be an endocrine disruptor; cause harm to a pregnant woman or a fetus; or cause neurological or developmental harm. In determining whether a pesticide under review under paragraph
(2)may be dangerous, the Administrator shall consider relevant evidence, including— epidemiological data; peer-reviewed literature; and data generated by a State or Federal agency or an agency of a foreign government. Notwithstanding any requirements or criteria under parts 152 and 160 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations), or any rule issued by the Administrator under docket number EPA–HQ–OA–2018–0259, the Administrator shall not discount, otherwise ignore, or give disproportionately more or less weight to evidence described in clause (i). In determining whether a pesticide under review under paragraph
(2)may be dangerous, the Administrator shall not consider any economic analysis of the benefits or costs of continuing to register the pesticide. Prior to making a final determination under subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall provide a draft determination for not less than 90 days of public comment. Any person may bring a civil action against the Administrator where there is an alleged failure of the Administrator to comply with any provision of this subsection. An action under subparagraph
(A)shall be reviewable in the district courts of the United States pursuant to section 16(a). .
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 4
Emergency review of pesticides banned in other nations
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.