Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · S. 3820 (Introduced in Senate) — To amend the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 to authorize the Open Technology Fund of the United... · Sec. 4

Sec. 4. Establishment of the Open Technology Fund

1,690 words·~8 min read·/bill/116/s/3820/is/section-4

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 ( 22 U.S.C. 6201 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 309 the following: There is established a grantee entity, to be known as the Open Technology Fund , which shall carry out this section. Grants authorized under section 305 shall be available to award annual grants to the Open Technology fund for the purpose of— promoting, consistent with United States law, unrestricted access to uncensored sources of information via the internet; and enabling journalists, including journalists employed by or affiliated with the Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Radio Free Asia, the Middle East Broadcasting Networks, the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, or any entity funded by or partnering with the United States Agency for Global Media to create and disseminate news and information consistent with the purposes, standards, and principles specified in sections 302 and 303.
The Open Technology Fund shall use grant funds received pursuant to subsection (a)(2)— to advance freedom of the press and unrestricted access to the internet in repressive environments oversees; to research, develop, implement, and maintain— technologies that circumvent techniques used by authoritarian governments, nonstate actors, and others to block or censor access to the internet, including circumvention tools that bypass internet blocking, filtering, and other censorship techniques used to limit or block legitimate access to content and information; and secure communication tools and other forms of privacy and security technology that facilitate the creation and distribution of news and enable audiences to access media content on censored websites; to advance internet freedom by supporting private and public sector research, development, implementation, and maintenance of technologies that provide secure and uncensored access to the internet to counter attempts by authoritarian governments, nonstate actors, and others to improperly restrict freedom online; to research and analyze emerging technical threats and develop innovative solutions through collaboration with the private and public sectors to maintain the technological advantage of the United States Government over authoritarian governments, nonstate actors, and others; to develop, acquire, and distribute requisite internet freedom technologies and techniques for the United States Agency for Global Media, in accordance with paragraph (2), and digital security interventions, to fully enable the creation and distribution of digital content between and to all users and regional audiences; to prioritize programs for countries, the governments of which restrict freedom of expression on the internet, that are important to the national interest of the United States in accordance with section 7050(b)(2)(C) of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2020 (division G of Public Law 116–94 ); and to carry out any other effort consistent with the purposes of this Act or press freedom overseas if requested or approved by the United States Agency for Global Media.
In carrying out subsection (b), the Open Technology Fund shall— support fully open-source tools, code, and components, to the extent practicable, to ensure such supported tools and technologies are as secure, transparent, and accessible as possible; and require that any such tools, components, code, or technology supported by the Open Technology Fund remain fully open-source, to the extent practicable; support technologies that undergo comprehensive security audits to ensure that such technologies are secure and have not been compromised in a manner detrimental to the interests of the United States or to individuals or organizations benefitting from programs supported by the Open Technology Fund; review and periodically update, as necessary, security auditing procedures used by the Open Technology Fund to reflect current industry security standards; establish safeguards to mitigate the use of such supported technologies for illicit purposes; solicit project proposals through an open, transparent, and competitive application process to attract innovative applications and reduce barriers to entry; seek input from technical, regional, and subject matter experts from a wide range of relevant disciplines; and to review, provide feedback, and evaluate proposals to ensure that the most competitive projects are funded; implement an independent review process, through which proposals are reviewed by such experts to ensure the highest degree of technical review and due diligence; maximize cooperation with the public and private sectors, foreign allies, and partner countries to maximize efficiencies and eliminate duplication of efforts; and utilize any other methodology approved by the United States Agency for Global Media in furtherance of the mission of the Open Technology Fund.
Any grant agreement with, or grants made to, the Open Technology Fund under this section shall be subject to the following limitations and restrictions: The headquarters of the Open Technology Fund and its senior administrative and managerial staff shall be located in a location which ensures economy, operational effectiveness, and accountability to the United States Agency for Global Media. Grants awarded under this section shall be made pursuant to a grant agreement requiring that— grant funds are only used on activities consistent with this section; and failure to comply with such requirement shall result in termination of the grant without further fiscal obligation to the United States.
Each grant agreement under this section shall require that each contract entered into by the Open Technology Fund specify that all obligations are assumed by the grantee and not by the United States Government. Each grant agreement under this section shall require that any lease agreements entered into by the Open Technology Fund shall be, to the maximum extent possible, assignable to the United States Government. Administrative and managerial costs for operation of the Open Technology Fund— should be kept to a minimum; and to the maximum extent feasible, should not exceed the costs that would have been incurred if the Open Technology Fund had been operated as a Federal entity rather than as a grantee.
Grant funds may not be used for any activity whose purpose is influencing the passage or defeat of legislation considered by Congress. The Open Technology Fund shall be subject to the oversight and governance by the United States Agency for Global Media in accordance with section 305. The United States Agency for Global Media, its broadcast entities, and the Open Technology Fund should render such assistance to each other as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this section or any other provision under this Act.
Nothing in this section may be construed to make the Open Technology Fund an agency or instrumentality of the Federal Government. Employees of a grantee of the United States Agency for Global Media may be detailed to the Agency, in accordance with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 ( 42 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.) and Federal employees may be detailed to a grantee of the United States Agency for Global Media, in accordance with such Act. The United States Agency for Global Media shall ensure that internet freedom research and development projects of the Open Technology Fund are de­con­flict­ed with internet freedom programs of the Department of State and other relevant United States Government departments.
Agencies should still share information and best practices relating to the implementation of subsections
(b)and (c). The Open Technology Fund shall highlight, in its annual report, internet freedom activities, including a comprehensive assessment of the Open Technology Fund’s activities relating to the implementation of subsections
(b)and (c), which shall include— an assessment of the current state of global internet freedom, including— trends in censorship and surveillance technologies and internet shutdowns; and the threats such pose to journalists, citizens, and human rights and civil society organizations; and a description of the technology projects supported by the Open Technology Fund and the associated impact of such projects in the most recently completed year, including— the countries and regions in which such technologies were deployed; any associated metrics indicating audience usage of such technologies; and future-year technology project initiatives. Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this section, the Inspector General of the Department of State and the Foreign Service shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that indicates— whether the Open Technology Fund is— technically sound; cost effective; and satisfying the requirements under this section; and the extent to which the interests of the United States are being served by maintaining the work of the Open Technology Fund. Financial transactions of the Open Technology Fund that relate to functions carried out under this section may be audited by the Government Accountability Office in accordance with such principles and procedures and under such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Comptroller General of the United States. Any such audit shall be conducted at the place or places at which accounts of the Open Technology Fund are normally kept. The Government Accountability Office shall have access to all books, accounts, records, reports, files, papers, and property belonging to or in use by the Open Technology Fund pertaining to financial transactions as may be necessary to facilitate an audit. The Government Accountability Office shall be afforded full facilities for verifying transactions with any assets held by depositories, fiscal agents, and custodians. All such books, accounts, records, reports, files, papers, and property of the Open Technology Fund shall remain in the possession and custody of the Open Technology Fund. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Inspector General of the Department of State and the Foreign Service is authorized to exercise the authorities of the Inspector General Act of 1978 with respect to the Open Technology Fund. . The United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994 is amended— in section 304(d) ( 22 U.S.C. 6203(d) ), by inserting the Open Technology Fund, before the Middle East Broadcasting Networks ; in sections 305(a)(20) and 310(c) ( 22 U.S.C. 6204(a)(20) and 6209(c)), by inserting the Open Technology Fund, before or the Middle East Broadcasting Networks each place such term appears; and in section 310 ( 22 U.S.C. 6209 ), by inserting the Open Technology Fund, before and the Middle East Broadcasting Networks each place such term appears. There is authorized to be appropriated for the Open Technology Fund, which shall be used to carry out section 309A of the United States International Broadcasting Act of 1994, as added by subsection (a)— $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2021; and $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2022.
Connectionstraces to 6
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.