Sec. 1204. Assistance to non-Federal sponsors
2,058 words·~9 min read·
/bill/116/s/3591/is/section-1204·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
The Corps of Engineers shall provide assistance to the non-Federal interest of a project proposal described in subsection
(b)during the Corps of Engineers outreach required under section 7001(b) of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 ( 33 U.S.C. 2282d(b) ). A project proposal referred to in subsection
(a)is any of the following: Development of a management plan for restoration of the Chicago River, Illinois, pursuant to the resolution of the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate (108th Congress, 2d Session) relating to the Chicago River System Restoration Management Plan, Illinois, and dated June 23, 2004. Modification of the authorized funding level for the project for flood damage reduction, Des Moines and Raccoon Rivers, Des Moines, Iowa, authorized by section 1001(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1053). Modification of the project for navigation, Ouachita-Black Rivers, Arkansas and Louisiana, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 481) to include water supply as an authorized purpose. Modification of the project for navigation, McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River, to deepen the navigation channel to a minimum depth of 12 feet, as authorized under section 136 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2004 (117 Stat. 1842). Modification of the project for flood risk management and water supply, Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Arkansas River Basin, Oklahoma, authorized by section 4 of the Act of June 28, 1938 (52 Stat 1218, chapter 795) to modify water storage and provide for a sufficient quantity of water supply storage space in the inactive pool storage to support the fishery downstream from Tenkiller Reservoir. Reauthorization of the project for environmental restoration, Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts, authorized by section 522 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2656), and deauthorized pursuant to section 6001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 ( 33 U.S.C. 579b ) (as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (130 Stat. 1690)). Modification of the project for flood damage reduction, Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts, authorized by section 522 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2656), to provide that in the case of phase II of the project, the non-Federal interest is not required to pay any cost of the project above the initial estimate. A feasibility study for a project for flood risk management, Hoosic River, Massachusetts. A feasibility study for a project for aquatic ecosystem restoration at the mouth of the Hood River, Oregon, at the confluence of that river with the Columbia River, Oregon. A feasibility study on resolving increased silting and shoaling adjacent to, but outside of, the Federal channel, experienced at the Port of Bandon, Coquille River, Oregon. A feasibility study on increasing the frequency and depth of dredging assistance from the Corps of Engineers at the Port of Astoria, located at the mouth of the Columbia River, Oregon. A feasibility study on modifying the project for navigation, Port of Gulfport, Mississippi, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4094), to deepen the navigation channel to 46 feet. A feasibility study to identify and evaluate opportunities to reduce the risk of flooding and restore lost habitat within the Escatawpa River Basin, Mississippi and Alabama. The project described in section 219(f)(231) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1266). A feasibility study for a project to design and construct the Naugatuck River Greenway Trail, a multiuse trail on Federal land between Torrington and Derby, Connecticut. A feasibility study for a project for coastal and flood risk management, Stratford, Connecticut. A feasibility study for projects for flood risk management, Woodbridge, Connecticut. Modification of the authorized funding level for the project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows, St. Louis, Missouri, authorized by section 219(f)(32) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 337; 121 Stat. 1233). A feasibility study for projects for ecosystem restoration, Bangert Island, St. Charles, Missouri, related to channels and aquatic habitats. Modification of the authorized funding level for the project to carry out water related infrastructure, El Paso, Texas, authorized by section 219(f)(269) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1268). Modification of the authorized funding level for the South Central Pennsylvania environmental restoration infrastructure and resource protection development pilot program under section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845; 121 Stat. 1146). A feasibility study for dam safety improvements, Oroville Dam, California. Modification of the authorized funding level for the project for water supply, Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina. An environmental infrastructure project to increase hydrologic variability, Sacramento Regional Water Bank, California. A study for a project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and allied purposes, Blue River Watershed, Missouri and Kansas. A project for aquatic and riparian restoration, Line Creek, Riverside, Kansas. Modification of the authorized funding level for the environmental infrastructure program, Central New Mexico, under section 593 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 381; 119 Stat. 2255). Modification of the authorized funding level for the environmental assistance program, Ohio and North Dakota, under section 594 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 383; 121 Stat. 1140; 121 Stat. 1944). A study for a fish passage for ecological restoration, Lower Alabama River, Alabama. Modification of the project for Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Deep Creek bridge replacement, Virginia. Modification of projects for water supply, wastewater infrastructure, and environmental restoration, Virginia, authorized by section 219(f)(10) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1255). Modification of the project for flood risk management, Red River below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas, for Caddo Levee District, Louisiana, to incorporate the Cherokee Park Levee into the project. Modification of the Mississippi River and Tributaries Project authorized by the first section of the Act of May 15, 1928 (45 Stat. 534, chapter 569) to include the portion of the Ouachita River Levee System at and below Monroe, Louisiana, to Caldwell Parish, Louisiana. Modification of the project for navigation, Port of Iberia, Louisiana. A feasibility study for flood risk management and storm damage reduction in the Hoey's Basin area of the eastbank of Jefferson Parish, including a study of the pump to the river concept. A feasibility study for a project for flood risk management, Cataouatche Subbasin, which encompasses part of the westbank of Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. Modification of the project for beach erosion and hurricane protection, Grand Isle, Louisiana, to include periodic beach nourishment. A feasibility study, Arkansas River Basin, Oklahoma, to determine whether the purchase of additional flood easements, changes in lake level management, additional levee infrastructure, or implementation of other flood risk management or containment mechanisms along the Arkansas River Basin would benefit local communities by reducing flood risks around projects of the Secretary in a range of different flood scenarios. Modification of the authorized funding level for critical restoration projects, Lake Champlain watershed, Vermont and New York, authorized by section 542 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2671; 121 Stat. 1150). Modification of the authorized funding level for wastewater infrastructure, Charlotte County, Florida, authorized by section 219(f)(121) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 121 Stat. 1261). A project to extend dredging of the South Haven Harbor, Michigan, to include the former Turning Basin. Modification of the project for flood risk management, Upper Rouge River, Wayne County, Michigan. A feasibility study for the project for flood risk management, Tonto Creek, Arizona. A feasibility study for the project for flood risk management, Sikorsky Airport, Bridgeport, Connecticut. Modification of the authorized funding level for the environmental infrastructure project, Calaveras County, California, under section 219(f)(86) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1259). Modification of the project for navigation, River Rouge, Michigan. A feasibility study for dredge disposal management activities, Port of Florence, Alabama. A feasibility study for the project for navigation, Port of Oswego, New York. A project for repairs to the West Pier and West Barrier Bar, Little Sodus Bay Harbor, Cayuga County, New York. A project for repair of sheet pile wall and east breakwater, Great Sodus Bay, New York. A study of the resiliency of the Allegheny Reservoir, in consultation with the Seneca Nation. A feasibility study for potential projects for the rehabilitation of the Glenn Falls Feeder Canal, which begins at the Feeder Dam intersection with the Hudson River in Queensbury, New York, and runs to the confluence of the Old Champlain Canal in Kingsbury, New York. A feasibility study for the rehabilitation of the tainter gates and guard gate, Caughdenoy Dam, New York, including an evaluation of the rehabilitation work necessary to extend the service life of those structures, such as— improvements to the hydraulic efficiency of the gate systems; improvements to the concrete foundation and gate support structures; and any other improvements the Secretary determines to be necessary. Modification of the Upper Mississippi River Restoration program authorized by section 1103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 ( 33 U.S.C. 652 ). The project for flood protection, Bloomington, Indiana. The project for flood protection, Gary, Indiana. Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Athens, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(254) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Blaine, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(255) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Claiborne County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(256) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Giles County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(257) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Grainger County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(258) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Hamilton County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(259) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Harrogate, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(260) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Johnson County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(261) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Knoxville, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(262) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Nashville, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(263) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Lewis, Lawrence, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(264) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1268). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(265) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1268). Modification of the environmental infrastructure project, Plateau Utility District, Morgan County, Tennessee, authorized by section 219(f)(266) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1268). Extension of existing authority to the City of Sheffield, Alabama, for the Nashville District of the Corps of Engineers to replace a sewer pipe that floods when the Corps of Engineers mitigates flooding upstream as authorized by section 219(f)(263) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 335; 121 Stat. 1267). A research study to examine the causes of harmful algal blooms, such as agricultural runoff, sewer discharge, and commercial or industrial flows, and possible mitigation strategies for algal blooms in the Allegheny Reservoir Watershed, New York.
Connectionstraces to 5
Traces to 5 documents
26 references not yet in our index
- 121 Stat. 1053
- 74 Stat. 481
- 117 Stat. 1842
- 52 Stat. 1218
- 114 Stat. 2656
- 130 Stat. 1690
- 100 Stat. 4094
- 113 Stat. 335
- 121 Stat. 1266
- 113 Stat. 337
- 121 Stat. 1233
- 121 Stat. 1268
- 106 Stat. 4845
- 121 Stat. 1146
- 113 Stat. 381
- 119 Stat. 2255
- 113 Stat. 383
- 121 Stat. 1140
- 121 Stat. 1944
- 121 Stat. 1255
- 114 Stat. 2671
- 121 Stat. 1150
- 113 Stat. 334
- 121 Stat. 1261
- 121 Stat. 1259
- 121 Stat. 1267
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1204
Assistance to non-Federal sponsors
Stat.121 Stat. 1053
Stat.74 Stat. 481
Stat.117 Stat. 1842
Stat.52 Stat. 1218
Stat.114 Stat. 2656
Cites 31 · showing 10Cited by 0 across 0 sources