Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · S. 2297 (Reported in Senate) — To authorize appropriations for the Coast Guard, and for other purposes. · Sec. 227

Sec. 227. Resolution by Chief Acquisition Officer of acquisition disputes elevated to the Officer

153 words·~1 min read·/bill/116/s/2297/rs/section-227·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Subchapter I of chapter 11 of title 14, United States Code, as amended by section 226, is further amended by adding at the end the following: If, after 90 days following the elevation to the Chief Acquisition Officer of any design or other dispute regarding Level 1 or Level 2 acquisition, the dispute remains unresolved, the Commandant shall provide to the appropriate congressional committees a detailed description of the issue and the rationale underlying the decision taken by the Chief Acquisition Officer to resolve the issue. .
The analysis for chapter 11 of title 14, United States Code, as amended by section 226, is further amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1111 the following: 1112. Resolution by the Chief Acquisition Officer of acquisition disputes elevated to the Officer. . Section 401 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 ( Public Law 111–281 ) is amended by striking subsection (e).
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 111-281
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 227
Resolution by Chief Acquisition Officer of acquisition disputes elevated to the Officer
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111-281
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.