Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · S. 1811 (EAH) — 116 S1811 EAH: Water Resources Development Act of 2020 · Sec. 211

Sec. 211. Great Lakes coastal resiliency study

400 words·~2 min read·/bill/116/s/1811/eah/section-211

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

In carrying out the comprehensive assessment of water resources needs for the Great Lakes System under section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 ( 33 U.S.C. 2267a ), as required by section 1219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2018 (132 Stat. 3811), the Secretary shall— taking into account recent high lake levels within the Great Lakes, assess and make recommendations to Congress on— coastal storm and flood risk management measures, including measures that use natural features and nature-based features, as those terms are defined in section 1184 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2016 ( 33 U.S.C. 2289a ); operation and maintenance of the Great Lakes Navigation System, as such term is defined in section 210 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 ( 33 U.S.C. 2238 ); ecosystem protection and restoration; the prevention and control of invasive species and the effects of invasive species; and recreation associated with water resources development projects; prioritize actions necessary to protect critical public infrastructure, communities, and critical natural or cultural resources; and to the maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, utilize existing data provided to the Secretary by Federal and State agencies, Indian Tribes, and other stakeholders, including data obtained through other Federal programs.
In carrying out the comprehensive assessment described in subsection (a), the Secretary may make a recommendation to Congress for— the construction of a water resources development project; the structural or operational modification of an existing water resources development project; additional monitoring of, or adaptive management measures to carry out with respect to, existing water resources development projects, to respond to changing hydrologic and climatic conditions; or geographic areas within the Great Lakes System for additional study by the Secretary.
In addition to carrying out subsection (a), to contribute to the comprehensive assessment described in such subsection, the Secretary is authorized to conduct feasibility studies for— the project for coastal storm resiliency, Lake Ontario shoreline, New York; and the project for coastal storm resiliency, Chicago shoreline, Illinois. Any feasibility study carried out pursuant to this subsection, including pursuant to a recommendation under paragraph (1)(D), shall be considered to be a continuation of the comprehensive assessment described in subsection (a).
Section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 ( 33 U.S.C. 2282c ) shall not apply to any study recommended under subsection (b)(1)(D) or carried out pursuant to subsection (b)(2).
Connectionstraces to 4
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 132 Stat. 3811
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 211
Great Lakes coastal resiliency study
Stat.132 Stat. 3811
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.