Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · H.R. 8632 (Introduced in House) — To direct the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminis... · Sec. 103

Sec. 103. Report on blue carbon in the United States

362 words·~2 min read·/bill/116/hr/8632/ih/section-103

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act and every 2 years thereafter, the Administrator, in consultation with the interagency working group, shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report containing the following: A summary of federally funded coastal and marine blue carbon ecosystem research, monitoring, preservation, and restoration activities, including the budget for each of these activities and describe the progress in advancing the national priorities established by the interagency working group.
With respect to each blue carbon ecosystem— the type; location; and type of ownership, delineated by private lands, State lands, Tribal lands, or Federal. An assessment of the vulnerability of coastal and marine blue carbon ecosystems to climate impacts such as sea-level rise, acidification, and saltwater intrusion, and other environmental and human stressors, such as development, water pollution, and aquaculture. An assessment of the greatest anthropogenic threats to blue carbon ecosystems, including the Federal agency actions that have historically caused and presently cause great adverse effects on such ecosystems.
An assessment of the carbon sequestration potential of blue carbon ecosystems and the probable changes to sequestration under climate change scenarios. An assessment of biophysical, social, and economic impediments including water storage and flood control structures to coastal blue carbon ecosystem protection and restoration and opportunities to restore and enhance the resilience of and sequestration potential of blue carbon ecosystems. An assessment of aging or outdated artificial structures, including dikes, levees, dams, culverts, water storage structures, shoreline hardening projects, impediments to fish passage, and other infrastructure that impede the ecological or sequestration functions of blue carbon areas and the feasibility of repairing, retrofitting, or removing such structures.
The economic, social, and environmental co-benefits that these blue carbon ecosystems provide including— coastal protection from storms and flooding; tourism and recreational use; benefits to fisheries; nutrient removal; number of jobs that are directly or indirectly attributable to blue carbon ecosystems; and total economic activity that is attributable to such blue carbon ecosystems. An assessment of the social and economic makeup of the communities served by blue carbon ecosystems.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.