Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · H.R. 7575 (Reported in House) — To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United States, to provide for the conservation and devel... · Sec. 217

Sec. 217. GAO study on mitigation for water resources development projects

417 words·~2 min read·/bill/116/hr/7575/rh/section-217

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall— conduct a study on the mitigation of the impact of water resources development projects, including the impact on fish and wildlife, consistent with the requirements of section 906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 ( 33 U.S.C. 2283 ), section 307(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 ( 33 U.S.C. 2317(a) ), and section 2036(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 ( 33 U.S.C. 2283a ), including— an evaluation of guidance or instructions issued, and other measures taken, by the Secretary to ensure successful mitigation of such impacts; a review of the methods of mitigation, including the use of in-lieu fees, mitigation banking, and permittee-responsible mitigation, and their long-term effectiveness of restoring or mitigating ecosystem services impacted by such projects; a review of how the use of the different mitigation methods for such projects varies across Corps of Engineers districts; an assessment of the backlog of mitigation projects, including the number of mitigation projects pending completion to address such impacts resulting from constructed water resources development projects; an evaluation of how the Secretary tracks compliance with the mitigation requirements across Corps of Engineers districts; a review of how the mitigation requirements for water resources development projects contributes to the resilience of water resources in the United States; an assessment of whether mitigation is being done prior to or contemporaneously with the construction of projects, as required by section 906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 ( 33 U.S.C. 2283 ); an evaluation of compliance with section 906(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 ( 33 U.S.C. 2283(d) ) for the development of specific mitigation plans for projects, whether such plans were successful in mitigating the designated impacts of the projects, and, in instances where such plans were not successful, what actions the Secretary is taking to modify the plans such that they will be successful; and an assessment of how the Secretary might take advantage of natural infrastructure in mitigation planning to reduce flood risks and flood recovery costs for some communities; and submit to Congress a report that— describes the results of the study conducted under paragraph (1); includes recommendations to ensure compliance with and successful implementation of mitigation requirements for water resources development projects; and includes recommendations to ensure existing programs and authorities include the use, to the maximum extent practicable, of natural infrastructure.
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 217
GAO study on mitigation for water resources development projects
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.