Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · H.R. 6395 (Placed on Calendar Senate) — To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2021 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military c... · Sec. 2854

Sec. 2854. Study and strategy regarding bulk fuels management in United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility

453 words·~2 min read·/bill/116/hr/6395/pcs/section-2854·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress makes the following findings: The ordering and delivery of bulk fuels is organizationally bifurcated to the detriment of the Department of Defense. Legacy bulk fuel management will not meet the accelerated pace of operations required to support the National Defense Strategy and the emphasis on disaggregated operations. The number of United States flagged tanking vessels continues to decline, which has resulted in an excessive reliance on foreign flagged tanking vessels to be available to support the National Defense Strategy.
A foreign flagged tanking vessel support strategy induces excessive risk to support United States disaggregated operations in a highly contested environment. The inadequacies of the legacy bulk fuel management strategy is particularly acute in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility. It is the sense of Congress that a single organizational element should be responsible for the bulk fuel management and delivery throughout the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility.
The Secretary of the Navy shall— conduct a study of current and projected bulk fuel management strategies in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility; and prepare a proposed bulk fuel management strategy that optimally supports bulk fuel management in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility. The study required by subsection
(c)shall include the following elements: A description of current organizational responsibility of bulk fuel management in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility from ordering, storage, strategic transportation, and tactical transportation to the last tactical mile. A description of legacy bulk fuel management assets that can be used to support the United States Indo-Pacific Command. Options for congressional consideration to better align organizational responsibility through the entirety of the bulk fuel management system in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility, as proposed in the bulk fuel management strategy prepared pursuant to paragraph
(2)of such subsection. The Secretary of the Navy shall conduct the study and prepare the bulk fuel management strategy required by subsection
(c)in coordination with subject-matter experts of the United States Indo-Pacific Command, the United States Transportation Command, and the Defense Logistics Agency. Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report containing the results of the study required by subsection
(c)and the bulk fuel management strategy required by such subsection. None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021 for the Navy for construction related to additional bulk fuel storage in the United States Indo-Pacific Command Area of Responsibility may be obligated or expended until the report required by subsection
(f)is submitted to the congressional defense committees.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.