Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · H.R. 6379 (Introduced in House) — Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, and for other purposes. · Sec. 70310

Sec. 70310. Sense of Congress regarding surprise medical bills

270 words·~1 min read·/bill/116/hr/6379/ih/section-70310·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress finds the following: Surprise medical bills can be financially devastating for consumers. Surprise medical bills are often unavoidable and occur in situations where consumers have no ability to reasonably choose an in-network provider or insurance company networks are too narrow for consumers to be able to access seamless in-network care. Consumers and their financial stability should not be caught in the middle between insurance companies and health care providers. It is imperative that Congress enacts a comprehensive, long-term solution to protect consumers and end surprise medical billing.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, consumers across the country will increasingly require emergency or unanticipated health care services and at the same time may have limited access to in-network providers due to the increased demand on the health care system and it is critical that they are not deterred from seeking care due to the threat of a surprise medical bill. The virus is now spreading faster in the United States than anywhere else in the world and experts indicate that day by day, more hospital beds will be full, more resources will be depleted, and the virus will claim more lives.
It is the sense of the Congress that, during the COVID-19 pandemic— heath care providers should refrain from balance billing consumers for out-of-network claims related to COVID-19 testing or treatment and insurance companies should do their utmost to secure access to in-network treatment for their plan participants, including providing adequate reimbursement rates for services; and consumers’ cost-sharing should be limited to what they would have paid if the providers testing or treating them for COVID-19 were in-network for their insurance plan.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.