Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · H.R. 6086 (Introduced in House) — To hold China, Russia, and other major shareholders of the International Monetary Fund accountable to the principles... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Opposition to quota increase for countries that undermine IMF principles

544 words·~2 min read·/bill/116/hr/6086/ih/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The Bretton Woods Agreements Act ( 22 U.S.C. 286–286zz ) is amended— by redesignating the 2nd section 73 (as added by section 1901 of division P of Public Law 116–94 ) as section 74; and by adding at the end the following: Not less than 7 days before consideration of any proposal to increase the quota of a foreign member of the Fund that is one of the 10 largest shareholders in the Fund, the Secretary of the Treasury shall submit a report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate that determines whether the foreign member meets the following criteria:
The member is in compliance with all obligations set forth in Article VIII of the Articles of Agreement of the Fund. The member, in the preceding 12 months, was not found to have manipulated its currency, as determined in a report required by section 3005 of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 or section 701 of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015. In the case of a member whose currency is included in the Special Drawing Rights basket of the Fund, the currency of the member is freely usable (within the meaning of Article XXX(f) of the Articles of Agreement of the Fund) and the Secretary concurs with the determinations of the Fund described in that Article, and, in the preceding 12 months, the member has demonstrated its commitment to ensuring that its currency is widely used and traded internationally.
The member is committed to the rules and principles of the Paris Club. On determining that a member of the Fund has failed to meet any of the criteria set forth in subsection (a), the Secretary shall instruct the Governor of the Fund to use the voice and vote of the United States to oppose the proposal to increase the quota of the member in the Fund. The President may waive subsection
(b)with respect to a member of the Fund on reporting to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate that— the waiver is important to the national interest of the United States, with an explanation of the reasons therefor; or the member is attempting to rectify the failure, with a description of the actions the member is taking to fulfill any unmet criteria. Notwithstanding subsection (c), the Governor of the Fund may not use the voice or vote of the United States to support a proposal to increase the quota of a member in the Fund if the President of the United States determines that the government of the member interfered in a United States election for Federal office (as defined in section 301 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971) in the 4 years preceding consideration of the proposal. For the purposes of this section, consideration of a proposal to increase the quota of a foreign member of the Fund does not include consent to an amendment to the Articles of Agreement of the Fund that has been authorized by law. This section shall cease to have force or effect 10 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. .
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 22 USC 286–286zz
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
Opposition to quota increase for countries that undermine IMF principles
Cite22 USC 286–286zz
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.