Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · H.R. 3366 (Introduced in House) — To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to prohibit the stigmatization of children who are unable t... · Sec. 4

Sec. 4. Reducing stigma associated with unpaid school meal fees

474 words·~2 min read·/bill/116/hr/3366/ih/section-4

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 9(b)(10) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1758(b)(10) ) is amended to read as follows: A local educational agency or school food authority may not, based on the status of a covered child as a covered child— physically segregate such covered child; overtly identify such covered child— through the use of special tokens or tickets; or by an announcement or a published list of names; or identify or stigmatize such covered child by any other means.
For any covered child who is a member of a household that owes a week or more of unpaid school meal fees, a local educational agency shall— attempt to directly certify such covered child for free meals under paragraph
(4)or (5); or in a case where the local educational agency is not able to directly certify such covered child under paragraph
(4)or (5), provide to the household of such covered child— a household application and applicable descriptive material; and written and oral communications to encourage submission of the application. In attempting to collect unpaid school meal fees from a household, a local educational agency or school food authority may not— except as described in subparagraph (D), direct any communication regarding unpaid school meal fees to a covered child who is a member of such household; withhold educational opportunities from, or otherwise stigmatize, a covered child due to the status of the covered child as a covered child; or use a debt collector (as such term is defined in section 803 of the Consumer Credit Protection Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1692a )). A school food authority may permit a requirement that a covered child deliver a letter addressed to a parent or guardian of the covered child that contains a communication relating to unpaid school meal fees, subject to the condition that the letter shall not be distributed to the covered child in a manner that stigmatizes the covered child. In providing a meal to a covered child, a local educational agency or school food authority may not, based on the status of the covered child as a covered child, dispose of or take away from the covered child any food that has already been served to such covered child. In this paragraph: The term covered child means a child who— is enrolled in a school that participates in the school lunch program under this Act or the school breakfast program under section 4 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 ( 42 U.S.C. 1773 ); and is a member of a household that owes unpaid school meal fees. The term unpaid school meal fees means outstanding fees owed by a household to a local educational agency for lunches under this Act or breakfasts under section 4 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 ( 42 U.S.C. 1773 ). .
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 4
Reducing stigma associated with unpaid school meal fees
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.