Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 116th Congress · H.R. 19 (Introduced in House) — To provide for certain reforms with respect to the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act, the... · Sec. 203

Sec. 203. GAO report on conflicts of interest in State Medicaid program drug use review boards and pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committees

432 words·~2 min read·/bill/116/hr/19/ih/section-203

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an investigation of potential or existing conflicts of interest among members of State Medicaid program State drug use review boards (in this section referred to as DUR Boards ) and pharmacy and therapeutics committees (in this section referred to as P&T Committees ). Not later than 24 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to Congress a report on the investigation conducted under subsection
(a)that includes the following: A description outlining how DUR Boards and P&T Committees operate in States, including details with respect to— the structure and operation of DUR Boards and statewide P&T Committees; States that operate separate P&T Committees for their fee-for-service Medicaid program and their Medicaid managed care organizations or other Medicaid managed care arrangements (collectively referred to in this section as Medicaid MCOs) ; and States that allow Medicaid MCOs to have their own P&T Committees and the extent to which pharmacy benefit managers administer or participate in such P&T Committees. A description outlining the differences between DUR Boards established in accordance with section 1927(g)(3) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396r(g)(3) ) and P&T Committees. A description outlining the tools P&T Committees may use to determine Medicaid drug coverage and utilization management policies. An analysis of whether and how States or P&T Committees establish participation and independence requirements for DUR Boards and P&T Committees, including with respect to entities with connections with drug manufacturers, State Medicaid programs, managed care organizations, and other entities or individuals in the pharmaceutical industry. A description outlining how States, DUR Boards, or P&T Committees define conflicts of interest. A description of how DUR Boards and P&T Committees address conflicts of interest, including who is responsible for implementing such policies. A description of the tools, if any, States use to ensure that there are no conflicts of interest on DUR Boards and P&T Committees. An analysis of the effectiveness of tools States use to ensure that there are no conflicts of interest on DUR Boards and P&T Committees and, if applicable, recommendations as to how such tools could be improved. A review of strategies States may use to guard against conflicts of interest on DUR Boards and P&T Committees and to ensure compliance with the requirements of titles XI and XIX of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1301 et seq., 1396 et seq.) and access to effective, clinically appropriate, and medically necessary drug treatments for Medicaid beneficiaries, including recommendations for such legislative and administrative actions as the Comptroller General determines appropriate.
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 203
GAO report on conflicts of interest in State Medicaid program drug use review boards and pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) committees
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.