Sec. 4001. Sense of Congress relating to certain projects

1,076 words·~5 min read·/bill/115/s/2800/rs/section-4001

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

It is the sense of Congress that— the projects described in subsection

(b)are valuable; and the Corps of Engineers should expeditiously complete the post-authorization change report or report of the Chief of Engineers, as applicable, for each of those projects by the end of 2018. The projects referred to in subsection

(a)are each of the following: The project for flood risk management, Lower San Joaquin River, California. The project for coastal storm risk management, Pawcatuck River, Rhode Island, authorized in the matter under the heading under the heading Investigations under the heading Corps of Engineers—Civil in title X of division A of the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 ( Department of the Army Public Law 113–2 ; 127 Stat. 23). The project for coastal storm risk management, Hashamomuck Cove, New York, authorized in the matter under the heading under the heading Investigations under the heading Corps of Engineers—Civil in title X of division A of the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 ( Department of the Army Public Law 113–2 ; 127 Stat. 23). The project for coastal storm risk management and utilization of dredged material, Delaware River, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, authorized in the matter under the heading under the heading Investigations under the heading Corps of Engineers—Civil in title X of division A of the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 ( Department of the Army Public Law 113–2 ; 127 Stat. 23). The project for navigation, Seattle Harbor, Washington, carried out under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 ( 33 U.S.C. 549a ). The project for navigation, Elizabeth River and Southern Branch, Virginia, carried out under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 ( 33 U.S.C. 549a ). The project for navigation, Three Rivers, Arkansas, carried out under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 ( 33 U.S.C. 549a ). The project for navigation, San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico, described in the study authorized by the resolution adopted by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives on September 20, 2006. The project for flood risk management and ecosystem restoration, Española Valley, Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico, described in the study authorized by the resolution adopted by the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate on December 10, 2009. The project for ecosystem restoration, Resacas at Brownsville, Texas, carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 ( 33 U.S.C. 2330 ). The project for flood control, navigation, and ecosystem restoration, Anacostia Watershed, Prince George's County, Maryland, described in the study authorized by the resolution adopted by the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the House of Representatives on September 8, 1988. The project for flood control, Willamette River Basin, Oregon, described in the Willamette River Basin Review Study authorized by the resolution adopted by the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the House of Representatives on September 8, 1988. The project for flood risk management and coastal storm risk management, Norfolk, Virginia, authorized in the matter under the heading under the heading Investigations under the heading Corps of Engineers—Civil in title X of division A of the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2013 ( Department of the Army Public Law 113–2 ; 127 Stat. 23). The project for flood risk management, Armourdale and Central Industrial District Levee Units, Missouri River and Tributaries at Kansas City, Kansas, authorized by section 1401(2) of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (130 Stat. 1711) (as modified by section 3504). The project for navigation and hurricane and storm damage reduction, Houma, Louisiana, authorized by section 1001(24)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1053). The project for flood risk management, Souris River Basin, Minot, North Dakota, authorized by section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1423). The project for ecosystem restoration, Delta Islands and Levees, California, described in the study authorized by— the resolution adopted by the Committee on Public Works of the Senate on June 1, 1948; the resolution adopted by the Committee on Public Works of the House of Representatives on May 8, 1948; and House Report 108–357, accompanying the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2004 ( Public Law 108–137 ; 117 Stat. 1827). The project for navigation, Chickamauga Lock, Tennessee, authorized by section 114 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2003 ( Public Law 108–7 ; 117 Stat. 140). The project for ecosystem restoration, South Florida, Florida, authorized by section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2680). The project for navigation, Freeport Harbor, Texas, carried out under section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 ( 33 U.S.C. 549a ). The project for Soo Locks, Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, authorized by section 1149 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254; 121 Stat. 1131). The project for ecosystem restoration, Central Everglades, Florida, authorized by section 1401(4) of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (130 Stat. 1713). The project for water supply and ecosystem restoration, Howard A. Hanson Dam, Washington, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 180) and modified by section 101(b)(15) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 281). The project for ecosystem restoration, Kissimmee River, Florida, authorized by section 101(8) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802). The project for flood risk management, Green Brook Sub-Basin, Raritan River Basin, New Jersey, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4119). The project for shore protection and harbor mitigation, Fort Pierce Beach, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1092), section 102 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 732), and section 506(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), and modified by section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 301). The project for flood control, McMicken Dam, Arizona, authorized by section 304 of the Act of August 7, 1953 (67 Stat. 450, chapter 342). The project for flood protection, Cave Buttes Dam, Arizona, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1083). The project for navigation, Norfolk Harbor and Channels, Virginia, authorized by section 201(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4090).

Connectionstraces to 3

Traces to 3 documents

public-private-law