Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 115th Congress · S. 1512 (Introduced in Senate) — To prohibit the Secretary of Energy, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of the I... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Findings

1,034 words·~5 min read·/bill/115/s/1512/is/section-2·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress finds that— as a tool to justify Federal actions by the Secretary of Energy, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Transportation, and the Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality to address greenhouse gas emissions, including the regulation or prohibition of the exploration, mining, production, and use of coal and other fossil fuels as energy sources, the social cost of greenhouse gases, specifically the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide, represents the hypothetical cost of 1 incremental ton of carbon dioxide, methane, or nitrous oxide emissions in a given year; the document of the Office of Management and Budget entitled Circular A–4 and dated September 17, 2003— guides Federal agencies on the development of regulatory impact analysis required under Executive Order 12866 ( 5 U.S.C. 601 note; relating to regulatory planning and review) and other authorities; and instructs Federal agencies to include discount rates of 3 and 7 percent and evaluate the costs and benefits of the regulatory action that accrue to citizens and residents of the United States; first developed in 2009 by an interagency working group that included the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation, and the Council on Environmental Quality, the estimates for the social cost of carbon and the subsequently developed social cost of methane and social cost of nitrous oxide fail to comply with the 3- and 7-percent discount rates prescribed by the document of the Office of Management and Budget entitled Circular A–4 and dated September 17, 2003; while the document of the Office of Management and Budget entitled Circular A–4 and dated September 17, 2003, specifies that, in carrying out an evaluation of the global effects of a rule, regulation, or action, the evaluation shall be reported separately from domestic costs and benefits of that rule, regulation, or action, the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide instead calculates the global benefits in lieu of, not in addition to, the domestic costs of a rule, regulation, or action; the use of the estimates of the social cost of greenhouse gases, including the estimates for the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide, in the rulemakings and other actions of the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Transportation, and the Council on Environmental Quality was without— an adequate opportunity for public notice and comment; and rigorous scientific peer review; the Environmental Protection Agency relied on— the interagency working group estimate of the social cost of methane, without appropriate peer review or opportunity for public notice and comment, in attempting to justify the costs and benefits of— the proposed rule entitled Oil and Natural Gas Sector:
Emission Standards for New and Modified Sources (80 Fed. Reg. 56593 (September 18, 2015)); and the final rule entitled Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources (81 Fed. Reg. 35824 (June 3, 2016)) and the accompanying regulatory impact analysis entitled Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Final Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources , prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, in May 2016 and identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0505–7630; and the interagency working group estimate of the social cost of carbon, without appropriate peer review or opportunity for public notice and comment, in attempting to justify the costs and benefits of— the final rule entitled Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources:
Electric Utility Generating Units (80 Fed. Reg. 64510 (October 23, 2015)) and the accompanying regulatory impact analysis entitled Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units , prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, in October 2015 and identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0495; and the final rule entitled Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources:
Electric Utility Generating Units (80 Fed. Reg. 64662 (October 23, 2015)) and the accompanying regulatory impact analysis entitled Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Clean Power Plan Final Rule , prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, in October 2015 and identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OAR–2013–0602; the Department of the Interior used the social cost of methane estimate to justify the costs and benefits of the final rule entitled Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation (81 Fed. Reg. 83008 (November 18, 2016)); the Council on Environmental Quality issued final guidance on August 1, 2016, that, with respect to a monetary cost-benefit analysis for an evaluation of a proposed Federal action under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ( 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), directed the head of each Federal agency to include the social cost of carbon in any consideration of the effect of greenhouse gas emissions; continued use of the social cost of greenhouse gases, including the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide by the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Transportation, and the Council on Environmental Quality ignores sound science;
Executive Order 13777 (82 Fed. Reg. 12285 (March 1, 2017)) states that the policy of the United States is to alleviate any unnecessary regulatory burden on the people of the United States; and Executive Order 13783 (82 Fed. Reg. 16093 (March 31, 2017))— disbands the interagency working group referred to in paragraph (3); withdraws the social cost of carbon, the social cost of methane, and the social cost of nitrous oxide; and directs Federal agencies, in monetizing the value of changes in greenhouse gas emissions as a result of a regulation, to follow the document of the Office of Management and Budget entitled Circular A–4 and dated September 17, 2003, by using the discount rates specified in that document and evaluating only the domestic effects of the regulation.
Connectionstraces to 6
6 references not yet in our index
  • 80 FR 56593
  • 81 FR 35824
  • 80 FR 64510
  • 80 FR 64662
  • 81 FR 83008
  • 82 FR 12285
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
Findings
Fed. Reg.80 FR 56593
Fed. Reg.81 FR 35824
Fed. Reg.80 FR 64510
Fed. Reg.80 FR 64662
Fed. Reg.81 FR 83008
Cites 12 · showing 11Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.