Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 115th Congress · H.R. 6 (EAH) — 115 HR 6 EAH: SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act · Sec. 1004

Sec. 1004. Medicaid drug review and utilization

1,138 words·~5 min read·/bill/115/hr/6/eah/section-1004

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 1902(a) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396a(a) ), as amended by section 1001, is further amended— in paragraph (83), at the end, by striking and ; in paragraph (84), at the end, by striking the period and inserting ; and ; and by inserting after paragraph
(84)the following new paragraph: provide that the State is in compliance with the drug review and utilization requirements under subsection (oo)(1). . Section 1902 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396a ), as amended by section 1001, is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: For purposes of subsection (a)(85), the drug review and utilization requirements under this subsection are, subject to paragraph
(3)and beginning October 1, 2019, the following: The State has in place— safety edits (as specified by the State) for subsequent fills for opioids and a claims review automated process (as designed and implemented by the State) that indicates when an individual enrolled under the State plan (or under a waiver of the State plan) is prescribed a subsequent fill of opioids in excess of any limitation that may be identified by the State; safety edits (as specified by the State) on the maximum daily morphine equivalent that can be prescribed to an individual enrolled under the State plan (or under a waiver of the State plan) for treatment of chronic pain and a claims review automated process (as designed and implemented by the State) that indicates when an individual enrolled under the plan (or waiver) is prescribed the morphine equivalent for such treatment in excess of any limitation that may be identified by the State; and a claims review automated process (as designed and implemented by the State) that monitors when an individual enrolled under the State plan (or under a waiver of the State plan) is concurrently prescribed opioids and— benzodiazepines; or antipsychotics. The State requires each managed care entity (as defined in section 1932(a)(1)(B)) with respect to which the State has a contract under section 1903(m) or under section 1905(t)(3) to have in place, subject to paragraph (3), with respect to individuals who are eligible for medical assistance under the State plan (or under a waiver of the State plan) and who are enrolled with the entity, the limitations described in subclauses
(I)and
(II)of clause
(i)and a claims review automated process described in subclause
(III)of such clause. Nothing in this subparagraph may be construed as prohibiting a State or managed care entity from designing and implementing a claims review automated process under this subparagraph that provides for prospective or retrospective reviews of claims. Nothing in this subparagraph shall be understood as prohibiting the exercise of clinical judgment from a provider enrolled as a participating provider in a State plan (or waiver of the State plan) or contracting with a managed care entity regarding the best items and services for an individual enrolled under such State plan (or waiver). The State has in place a program (as designed and implemented by the State) to monitor and manage the appropriate use of antipsychotic medications by children enrolled under the State plan (or under a waiver of the State plan) and submits annually to the Secretary such information as the Secretary may require on activities carried out under such program for individuals not more than the age of 18 years generally and children in foster care specifically. The State has in place a process (as designed and implemented by the State) that identifies potential fraud or abuse of controlled substances by individuals enrolled under the State plan (or under a waiver of the State plan), health care providers prescribing drugs to individuals so enrolled, and pharmacies dispensing drugs to individuals so enrolled. The State shall include in the annual report submitted to the Secretary under section 1927(g)(3)(D) information on the limitations, requirement, program, and processes applied by the State under subparagraphs
(A)through
(C)in accordance with such manner and time as specified by the Secretary. Nothing shall prevent a State from satisfying the requirement— described in subparagraph
(A)by having safety edits or a claims review automated process described in such subparagraph that was in place before October 1, 2019; described in subparagraph
(B)by having a program described in such subparagraph that was in place before such date; or described in subparagraph
(C)by having a process described in such subparagraph that was in place before such date. For each fiscal year beginning with fiscal year 2020, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the most recent information submitted by States under paragraph (1)(D). The drug review and utilization requirements under this subsection shall not apply with respect to an individual who— is receiving— hospice or palliative care; or treatment for cancer; is a resident of a long-term care facility, of a facility described in section 1905(d), or of another facility for which frequently abused drugs are dispensed for residents through a contract with a single pharmacy; or the State elects to treat as exempted from such requirements. In order to ensure reasonable access to health care, the Secretary shall waive the drug review and utilization requirements under this subsection, with respect to a State, in the case of natural disasters and similar situations, and in the case of the provision of emergency services (as defined for purposes of section 1860D–4(c)(5)(D)(ii)(II)). . Section 1932 of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396u–2 ) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: Beginning not later than October 1, 2019, each contract under a State plan with a managed care entity (other than a primary care case manager) under section 1903(m) shall provide that the entity is in compliance with the applicable provisions of section 438.3(s)(2) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, section 483.3(s)(4)) of such title, and section 483.3(s)(5) of such title, as such provisions were in effect on March 31, 2018. . Section 1927(g) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(g) ) is amended— in paragraph (1)(A)— by striking of section 1903(i)(10)(B) and inserting of section 1902(a)(54) ; by striking , by not later than January 1, 1993, ; by inserting after gross overuse, the following: excessive utilization, ; and by striking or inappropriate or medically unnecessary care and inserting inappropriate or medically unnecessary care, or prescribing or billing practices that indicate abuse or excessive utilization ; and in paragraph (2)(B)— by inserting after gross overuse, the following: excessive utilization, ; and by striking or inappropriate or medically unnecessary care and inserting inappropriate or medically unnecessary care, or prescribing or billing practices that indicate abuse or excessive utilization . The amendments made by paragraph
(1)shall take effect with respect to retrospective drug use reviews conducted on or after October 1, 2020.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
2 references not yet in our index
  • 42 USC 1396u–2
  • 42 USC 1396r–8(g)
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1004
Medicaid drug review and utilization
Cite42 USC 1396u–2
Cite42 USC 1396r–8(g)
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.