Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 115th Congress · H.R. 4439 (Introduced in House) — To amend the Revised Statutes, the Bank Service Company Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, and the Home Owners’... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Findings

319 words·~1 min read·/bill/115/hr/4439/ih/section-2·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress finds the following: Insured depository institutions have found efficiencies in their lending operations through a variety of different relationships with nondepository institutions that perform different lending-related functions. The Federal banking regulators have recognized that insured depository institutions may enter into relationships with third parties to originate loans, have recognized the benefits of these arrangements for institutions and borrowers alike, and have issued guidance to ensure the safety and soundness of such relationships and to protect borrowers.
Insured depository institutions routinely engage in third-party lending arrangements and regulators have long recognized that third-party lending arrangements provide institutions with the ability to supplement, enhance or expedite lending services for their customers, and that engaging in third-party lending arrangements also enables institutions to reduce the cost of delivering credit products, to expand access to credit, and to achieve strategic goals. Litigation concerning loans made by an insured depository institution that involve arrangements with third parties that perform lending-related functions have required the courts to determine the identity and location of the lender but have reached inconsistent results.
Inconsistencies in the determinations of the identity and location of the lender under judicially crafted multi-factor balancing tests lessen the efficiency of the lending process, reduce the transparency of the lending process for both lenders and borrowers, and jeopardize the substantial benefits of third-party lending arrangements for borrowers and the economy. In order to maximize efficiency and transparency, it is necessary to clarify and reinforce existing law by codifying clear and straightforward standards that establish that an insured depository institution is the lender on any loan or discount made, or upon any note, bill of exchange or other evidence of debt where it is the party to which the debt is initially owed according to its terms and that any relationship with a third party that performs lending-related functions does not affect the determination of such institution’s role as the lender or its location.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.