Sec. 3122. Analysis of approaches for supplemental treatment of low-activity waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation
503 words·~2 min read·
/bill/114/s/2943/es/section-3122A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall enter into an arrangement with a federally funded research and development center to conduct an analysis of approaches for treating the portion of low-activity waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Richland, Washington, that, as of such date of enactment, is intended for supplemental treatment. The analysis required by subsection
(a)shall include the following: An analysis of, at a minimum, the following approaches for treating the low-activity waste described in subsection (a): Further processing of the low-activity waste to remove long-lived radioactive constituents, particularly technetium-99 and iodine-129, for immobilization with high-level waste. Vitrification, grouting, and steam reforming, and other alternative approaches identified by the Department of Energy for immobilizing the low-activity waste, in whole or after further processing or reclassification. An analysis of the following: The risks of the approaches described in paragraph
(1)relating to treatment and final disposition. The benefits and costs of such approaches. Anticipated schedules for such approaches, including the time needed to complete necessary construction and to begin treatment operations. The compliance of such approaches with applicable technical standards associated with and contained in regulations prescribed pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ( 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. ), the Solid Waste Disposal Act ( 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq. ) (commonly referred to as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. ) (commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act ), and the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ). Any obstacles that would inhibit the ability of the Department of Energy to pursue such approaches. The analysis required by subsection
(a)shall be conducted using state-of-the art risk assessment practices such as probabilistic risk assessment. Concurrent with entering into an arrangement with a federally funded research and development center under subsection (a), the Secretary shall enter into an arrangement with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to conduct a review of the analysis conducted by the federally funded research and development center. The review required by paragraph
(1)shall be conducted concurrent with the analysis required by subsection (a), and in a manner that is parallel to that analysis, so that the results of the review may be used to improve the quality of the analysis. Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 180 days thereafter, the Secretary shall provide to the congressional defense committees a briefing on the progress being made on the analysis required by subsection
(a)and the review required by subsection (d). Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the congressional defense committees the analysis required by subsection (a), the review of the analysis required by subsection (d), and any comments of the Secretary on the analysis or review.
Connectionstraces to 4
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 3122
Analysis of approaches for supplemental treatment of low-activity waste at Hanford Nuclear Reservation
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources