Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · S. 2658 (Introduced in Senate) — To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the Federal Aviation Administration for fiscal... · Sec. 1206

Sec. 1206. Remote towers

463 words·~2 min read·/bill/114/s/2658/is/section-1206·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall establish— in consultation with airport operators and general aviation users, a pilot program at public-use airports to construct and operate remote towers; and a selection process for participation in the pilot program. In establishing the pilot program, the Administrator shall consult with operators of remote towers in foreign countries to design the pilot program in a manner that leverages as many safety and airspace efficiency benefits as possible.
In selecting the airports for participation in the pilot program, the Administrator shall— to the extent practicable, ensure that at least 2 different vendors of remote tower systems participate; include at least 1 airport currently in the Contract Tower Program and at least 1 airport that does not have an air traffic control tower; and clearly identify the research questions that will be addressed at each airport. In selecting an airport for participation in the pilot program, the Administrator shall consider— how inclusion of that airport will add research value to assist the Administrator in evaluating the feasibility, safety, and benefits of using remote towers; the amount and variety of air traffic at an airport; and the costs and benefits of including that airport.
The Administrator shall clearly identify and collect air traffic control information and data from participating airports that will assist the Administrator in evaluating the feasibility, safety, and cost-benefits of remote towers. Not later than 1 year after the date the first remote tower is operational, and annually thereafter, the Administrator shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report— detailing any benefits, costs, or safety improvements associated with the use of the remote towers; and evaluating the feasibility of using remote towers, particularly in the Contract Tower Program and for airports without any air traffic control tower, or to improve safety at airports with towers.
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall select airports for participation in the pilot program. In this subsection: The term Contract Tower Program has the meaning given the term in section 47124(e) of title 49, United States Code. The term remote tower means a system whereby air traffic services are provided to operators at an airport from a location that may not be on or near the airport. For purposes of the pilot program under subsection (a), and after certificated systems are available, constructing a remote tower or acquiring and installing air traffic control, communications, or related equipment for a remote tower shall be considered airport development (as defined in section 47102 of title 49, United States Code) for purposes of subchapter I of chapter 471 of that title if components are installed and used at the airport, except for off-airport sensors installed on leased towers, as needed.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.