Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · S. 2080 (Introduced in Senate) — To amend title 49, United States Code, to enhance pipeline safety, to provide communities with access to improved inf... · Sec. 202

Sec. 202. Great Lakes Basin water crossing study and alternatives assessment

451 words·~2 min read·/bill/114/s/2080/is/section-202

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation, working with pipeline facility owners, operators, and State governments, shall conduct a comprehensive water crossing survey of all intrastate and interstate hazardous liquid pipeline facilities that cross waterways in the Great Lakes Basin in the waters of the United States (as defined in the final rule of the Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency entitled Clean Water Rule: Definition of (80 Fed. Reg. 37054; June 29, 2015)). Waters of the United States The survey required under subsection
(a)shall— produce a comprehensive map of all hazardous pipeline waterway crossings in the Great Lakes Basin, including lakes, rivers, and streams; evaluate the condition and structural integrity of pipelines at each crossing, considering factors that include pipeline thickness, diameter, weld integrity, internal and external corrosion, age, pressure, control and shut-off valves, burial depths, water depths, currents, and ice cover; identify risks of leak and rupture resulting from pipeline integrity failures, or any other vulnerability at the pipeline water crossings; identify gaps in data and information that exist in the pipeline network in the Great Lakes Basin, and request information related to pipeline integrity or risks from owners and operators with facilities that cross lakes, rivers, and streams; and produce recommendations to prevent future leaks, ruptures, and failures that could result in damage to waterways and natural resources in the Great Lakes Basin. Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall enter into a joint agreement with the National Research Council of the National Academies of Sciences to conduct a study in connection with the survey under this section. The study conducted under this subsection shall include— a study covering the elements described under paragraphs
(4)and
(5)of subsection (b); consideration of ways in which review of facility response plans as required by the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 ( 33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. ) and approval of permits under section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1344 ) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ( 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. ) of future and existing pipelines that cross waterways in the Great Lakes Basin would help prevent spills in the Great Lakes; and a risk assessment analysis for alternative transportation options to the hazardous liquid pipeline facility that crosses from the Upper Peninsula of Michigan to the Lower Peninsula of Michigan through the Straits of Mackinac, including— no action (status quo); rerouting; decommissioning and abandoning; replacing; modifying operations (such as limiting pipeline product transport to only natural gas liquids); and other transportation means.
Connectionstraces to 3
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 80 FR 37054
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 202
Great Lakes Basin water crossing study and alternatives assessment
Fed. Reg.80 FR 37054
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.