Sec. 3122. Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and operating contracts
489 words·~2 min read·
/bill/114/s/1376/pcs/section-3122·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Section 3121 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 ( Public Law 112–239 ; 126 Stat. 2175), as amended by section 3124 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 ( Public Law 113–66 ; 127 Stat. 1062), is further amended— in subsection (b)— by redesignating paragraphs
(4)and
(5)as paragraphs
(6)and (7), respectively; and by striking paragraphs
(1)through
(3)and inserting the following new paragraphs: a clear and complete description of the cost savings the Administrator expects to result from the competition for the contract over the life of the contract, including associated analyses, assumptions, and information sources used to determine such cost savings; a description of any key limitations or uncertainties that could affect such costs savings, including costs savings that are anticipated but not fully known; the costs of the competition for the contract, including the immediate costs of conducting the competition; a description of any expected disruptions or delays in mission activities or deliverables resulting from the competition for the contract; a clear and complete description of the benefits expected by the Administrator with respect to mission performance or operations resulting from the competition; ; by redesignating subsections
(c)and
(d)as subsections
(d)and (e), respectively; by inserting after subsection
(b)the following new subsection (c): A report required by subsection
(a)shall be prepared in accordance with— the information quality guidelines of the Department of Energy that are relevant to the clear and complete presentation of information on each matter required to be included in the report under subsection (b); and best practices of the Government Accountability Office and relevant industries for cost estimating, if appropriate. ; in subsection (d), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by striking paragraph
(1)and inserting the following new paragraph (1): Except as provided in paragraph (2), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the congressional defense committees a review of each report required by subsection
(a)with respect to a contract not later than 3 years after the report is submitted to such committees that includes an assessment, based on the most current information available, of the following: The actual cost savings achieved compared to cost savings estimated under subsection (b)(1), and any increased costs incurred under the contract that were unexpected or uncertain at the time the contract was awarded. Any disruptions or delays in mission activities or deliverables resulting from the competition for the contract compared to the disruptions and delayed estimated under subsection (b)(4). Whether expected benefits of the competition with respect to mission performance or operations have been achieved. ; and in subsection (e), as so redesignated— in paragraph (1), by striking 2013 through 2017 and inserting 2015 through 2020 ; by striking paragraph (2); by redesignating paragraph
(3)as paragraph (2); and in paragraph (2), as redesignated by subparagraph (C), by striking subsections
(a)and (d)(2) and inserting subsection
(a).
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
public-private-law
3 references not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 112-239
- 126 Stat. 2175
- 127 Stat. 1062
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 3122
Modifications to cost-benefit analyses for competition of management and operating contracts
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112-239
Stat.126 Stat. 2175
Stat.127 Stat. 1062
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources