Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · S. 1118 (Introduced in Senate) — To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2016 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for militar... · Sec. 813

Sec. 813. Exception to requirement to include cost or price to the Government as a factor in the evaluation of proposals for certain task or delivery order contracts

455 words·~2 min read·/bill/114/s/1118/is/section-813·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 3306(c) of title 41, United States Code, is amended— in paragraph (1), by inserting except as provided in paragraph (3), in subparagraphs
(B)and
(C)after the subparagraph designation; and by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: If the head of an agency issues a solicitation for multiple task or delivery order contracts under section 4103(d) of this title for the same or similar services and intends to make a contract award to each qualifying offeror— cost or price to the Federal Government need not, at the Government's discretion, be considered under subparagraph
(B)of paragraph
(1)as an evaluation factor for the contract award; and if, pursuant to subparagraph (A), cost or price to the Federal Government is not considered as an evaluation factor for the contract award— the disclosure requirement of subparagraph
(C)of paragraph
(1)shall not apply; and cost or price to the Federal Government shall be considered in conjunction with the issuance pursuant to section 4106(c) of this title of a task or delivery order under any contract resulting from the solicitation. In paragraph (3), the term qualifying offeror means an offeror that— is determined to be a responsible source; submits a proposal that conforms to the requirements of the solicitation; and the contracting officer has no reason to believe would likely offer other than fair and reasonable pricing. . Section 2305(a)(3) of title 10, United States Code, is amended— in subparagraph (A), by inserting (except as provided in subparagraph (C)) in clauses
(ii)and
(iii)after shall ; and by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs: If the head of an agency issues a solicitation for multiple task or delivery order contracts under section 2304a(d)(1)(B) of this title for the same or similar services and intends to make a contract award to each qualifying offeror— cost or price to the Federal Government need not, at the Government's discretion, be considered under clause
(ii)of subparagraph
(A)as an evaluation factor for the contract award; and if, pursuant to clause (i), cost or price to the Federal Government is not considered as an evaluation factor for the contract award— the disclosure requirement of clause
(iii)of subparagraph
(A)shall not apply; and cost or price to the Federal Government shall be considered in conjunction with the issuance pursuant to section 2304c(b) of this title of a task or delivery order under any contract resulting from the solicitation. In subparagraph (C), the term qualifying offeror means an offeror that— is determined to be a responsible source; submits a proposal that conforms to the requirements of the solicitation; and the contracting officer has no reason to believe would likely offer other than fair and reasonable pricing. .
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.