Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · H.R. 6196 (Introduced in House) — To amend the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 to ensure community accountability for areas repetitively damaged b... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Community accountability for repetitively flooded areas

485 words·~2 min read·/bill/114/hr/6196/ih/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 1361 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 ( 42 U.S.C. 4102 ) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: The Administrator shall, by regulation, require any covered community (as such term is defined in paragraph (3))— to analyze and map areas within the community where properties described in paragraph (3)(B) or flood-damaged facilities are located to determine areas repeatedly damaged by floods and to assess the continuing risks to such areas; and to develop a community-specific plan for addressing any continuing flood risks, submit such plan to the Administrator and update such plan at appropriate intervals, and make such plan, plan updates, and reports on progress in reducing flood risk available to the public, subject to section 552a of title 5, United States Code.
The Administrator shall, by regulation, provide appropriate sanctions for covered communities that fail to comply with the requirements under this subsection or to make sufficient progress in reducing the flood risks to areas in the community that are repeatedly damaged by floods. For purposes of this subsection, the term covered community means a community— that is participating, pursuant to section 1315, in the national flood insurance program; and within which are located— 50 or more repetitive loss structures (as such term is defined in paragraph (4)); 5 or more severe repetitive loss structures (as such term is defined in section 1366(h)) for which mitigation activities meeting the standards for approval under section 1366(c)(2)(A) have not been conducted; or a public facility or a private nonprofit facility (as such terms are as defined in section 102 of the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act ( 42 U.S.C. 5122 )), that has received assistance for repair, restoration, reconstruction, or replacement under section 406 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act ( 42 U.S.C. 5172 ) in connection with more than one flooding event in the most recent 10-year period. For purposes of this subsection, the term repetitive-loss structure means a structure insured under a contract for flood insurance made available under this title that has had at least 2 flood losses for which claims were paid under such coverage of more than $1,000 each in any 10-year period beginning after 1978.
Not later than the expiration of the 6-year period beginning upon the date of the enactment of this subsection, and not less than every 2 years thereafter, the Administrator shall submit a report to the Congress regarding the progress in implementing plans developed pursuant to paragraph (1)(B). . The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall issue regulations necessary to carry out subsection
(e)of section 1361 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as added by the amendment made by subsection
(a)of this section, not later than the expiration of the 2-year period that begins on the date of the enactment of this Act.
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
Community accountability for repetitively flooded areas
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.