Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · H.R. 5303 (Introduced in House) — To provide for improvements to the rivers and harbors of the United States, to provide for the conservation and devel... · Sec. 401

Sec. 401. Project authorizations

766 words·~3 min read·/bill/114/hr/5303/ih/section-401·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The following projects for water resources development and conservation and other purposes, as identified in the reports titled Report to Congress on Future Water Resources Development submitted to Congress on January 29, 2015, and January 29, 2016, respectively, pursuant to section 7001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 ( 33 U.S.C. 2282d ) or otherwise reviewed by Congress, are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this section:
A. State B. Name C. Date of Report of Chief of Engineers D. Estimated Costs 1. TX Brazos Island Harbor Nov. 3, 2014 Federal: $116,116,000 Non-Federal: $88,471,000 Total: $204,587,000 2. LA Calcasieu Lock Dec. 2, 2014 Total: $16,700,000 (to be derived ½ from the general fund of the Treasury and ½ from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund) 3. NH, ME Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River Feb. 8, 2015 Federal: $15,580,000 Non-Federal: $5,190,000 Total: $20,770,000 4. FL Port Everglades Jun. 25, 2015 Federal: $220,200,000 Non-Federal: $102,500,000 Total: $322,700,000 5.
AK Little Diomede Harbor Aug. 10, 2015 Federal: $26,015,000 Non-Federal: $2,945,000 Total: $28,960,000 6. SC Charleston Harbor Sep. 8, 2015 Federal: $224,300,000 Non-Federal: $269,000,000 Total: $493,300,000 7. AK Craig Harbor March 16, 2016 Federal: $29,062,000 Non-Federal: $3,255,000 Total: $32,317,000. A. State B. Name C. Date of Report of Chief of Engineers D. Estimated Costs 1. TX Leon Creek Watershed Jun. 30, 2014 Federal: $18,314,000 Non-Federal: $9,861,000 Total: $28,175,000 2.
MO, KS Armourdale and Central Industrial District Levee Units, Missouri River and Tributaries at Kansas Citys Jan. 27, 2015 Federal: $207,036,000 Non-Federal: $111,481,000 Total: $318,517,000 3. KS City of Manhattan Apr. 30, 2015 Federal: $15,440,100 Non-Federal: $8,313,900 Total: $23,754,000 4. TN Mill Creek Oct. 16, 2015 Federal: $17,759,000 Non-Federal: $10,745,000 Total: $28,504,000 5. KS Upper Turkey Creek Basin Dec. 22, 2015 Federal: $24,584,000 Non-Federal: $13,238,000 Total: $37,822,000 6.
NC Princeville Feb. 23, 2016 Federal: $14,001,000 Non-Federal: $7,539,000 Total: $21,540,000 7. CA American River Common Features Apr. 26, 2016 Federal: $876,478,000 Non-Federal: $689,272,000 Total: $1,565,750,000 8. CA West Sacramento Apr. 26, 2016 Federal: $776,517,000 Non-Federal: $414,011,000 Total: $1,190,528,000. A. State B. Name C. Date of Report of Chief of Engineers D. Estimated Initial Costs and Estimated Renourishment Costs 1. SC Colleton County Sep. 5, 2014 Initial Federal: $13,733,850 Initial Non-Federal: $7,395,150 Initial Total: $21,129,000 Renourishment Federal: $16,371,000 Renourishment Non-Federal: $16,371,000 Renourishment Total: $32,742,000 2.
FL Flagler County Dec. 23, 2014 Initial Federal: $9,218,300 Initial Non-Federal: $4,963,700 Initial Total: $14,182,000 Renourishment Federal: $15,390,000 Renourishment Non-Federal: $15,390,000 Renourishment Total: $30,780,000 3. NC Carteret County Dec. 23, 2014 Initial Federal: $24,263,000 Initial Non-Federal: $13,064,000 Initial Total: $37,327,000 Renourishment Federal: $114,728,000 Renourishment Non-Federal: $114,728,000 Renourishment Total: $229,456,000 4. NJ Hereford Inlet to Cape May Inlet, Cape May County Jan. 23, 2015 Initial Federal: $14,040,000 Initial Non-Federal: $7,560,000 Initial Total: $21,600,000 Renourishment Federal: $41,215,000 Renourishment Non-Federal: $41,215,000 Renourishment Total: $82,430,000 5.
LA West Shore Lake Pontchartrain Jun. 12, 2015 Federal: $466,760,000 Non-Federal: $251,330,000 Total: $718,090,000 6. CA San Diego County Apr. 26, 2016 Initial Federal: $20,166,000 Initial Non-Federal: $10,858,000 Initial Total: $31,024,000 Renourishment Federal: $68,215,000 Renourishment Non-Federal: $68,215,000 Renourishment Total: $136,430,000. A. State B. Name C. Date of Report of Chief of Engineers D. Estimated Costs 1. FL Central Everglades Dec. 23, 2014 Federal: $976,375,000 Non-Federal: $974,625,000 Total: $1,951,000,000 2.
WA Skokomish River Dec. 14, 2015 Federal: $12,782,000 Non-Federal: $6,882,000 Total: $19,664,000. A. State B. Name C. Date of Report of Chief of Engineers D. Estimated Costs 1. IL, WI Upper Des Plaines River and Tributaries Jun. 8, 2015 Federal: $199,393,000 Non-Federal: $107,694,000 Total: $307,087,000. A. State B. Name C. Date of Report of Chief of Engineers D. Estimated Costs 1. CA South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Dec. 18, 2015 Federal: $69,521,000 Non-Federal: $104,379,000 Total: $173,900,000.
A. State B. Name C. Date of Report of Chief of Engineers D. Estimated Costs 1. OR Willamette River Dec. 14, 2015 Federal: $19,143,000 Non-Federal: $10,631,000 Total: $29,774,000 2. CA Los Angeles River Dec. 18, 2015 Federal: $375,773,000 Non-Federal: $980,835,000 Total: $1,356,608,000. A. State B. Name C. Date of Decision Document D. Estimated Costs 1. TX Upper Trinity River May 21, 2008 Federal: $526,500,000 Non-Federal: $283,500,000 Total: $810,000,000 2. KY Green River Locks and Dams 3, 4, 5, 6 and Barren River Lock and Dam 1 Disposition Apr. 30, 2015 Federal: $0 Non-Federal: $0 Total: $0 3.
KS Turkey Creek Basin May 13, 2016 Federal: $97,067,750 Non-Federal: $55,465,250 Total: $152,533,000 4. KY Ohio River Shoreline May 13, 2016 Federal: $34,860,000 Non-Federal: $11,620,000 Total: $46,480,000 5. MO Blue River Basin May 13, 2016 Federal: $20,309,900 Non-Federal: $10,936,100 Total: $31,246,000.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 401
Project authorizations
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.