Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · H.R. 4909 (Reported in House) — To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2017 for military activities of the Department of Defense and for militar... · Sec. 122

Sec. 122. Sense of Congress on aircraft carrier procurement schedules

187 words·~1 min read·/bill/114/hr/4909/rh/section-122

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress finds the following: In a report submitted to Congress on March 17, 2015, the Secretary of the Navy indicated the Department of the Navy has a requirement of 11 aircraft carriers. In the Congressional Budget Office report titled An Analysis of the Navy’s Fiscal Year 2016 Shipbuilding Plan , the Office stated as follows: To prevent the carrier force from declining to 10 ships in the 2040s, 1 short of its inventory goal of 11, the Navy could accelerate purchases after 2018 to 1 every four years, rather than 1 every five years .
It is the sense of Congress that— the plan of the Department of the Navy to schedule the procurement of one aircraft carrier every five years will reduce the overall aircraft carrier inventory to 10 aircraft carriers, a level insufficient to meet peacetime and war plan requirements; and to accommodate the required aircraft carrier force structure, the Department of the Navy should— begin to program construction for the Ford class aircraft carrier designated CVN–81 in fiscal year 2022; and program the required advance procurement activities to accommodate the construction of such carrier.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.