Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · H.R. 22 (EAH) — 114 HR 22 EAH: Surface Transportation Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2015 · Sec. 7013

Sec. 7013. Study and testing of electronically controlled pneumatic brakes

1,096 words·~5 min read·/bill/114/hr/22/eah/section-7013

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct an independent evaluation of ECP brake systems, pilot program data, and the Department’s research and analysis on the costs, benefits, and effects of ECP brake systems. In completing the independent evaluation under paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall examine the following issues related to ECP brake systems: Data and modeling results on safety benefits relative to conventional brakes and to other braking technologies or systems, such as distributed power and 2-way end-of-train devices.
Data and modeling results on business benefits, including the effects of dynamic braking. Data on costs, including up-front capital costs and on-going maintenance costs. Analysis of potential operational benefits and challenges, including the effects of potential locomotive and car segregation, technical reliability issues, and network disruptions. Analysis of potential implementation challenges, including installation time, positive train control integration complexities, component availability issues, and tank car shop capabilities.
Analysis of international experiences with the use of advanced braking technologies. Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the results of the independent evaluation under paragraph (1). The Secretary shall enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences to— complete testing of ECP brake systems during emergency braking application, including more than 1 scenario involving the uncoupling of a train with 70 or more DOT–117-specification or DOT–117R-specification tank cars; and transmit, not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the results of the testing.
In completing the testing under paragraph (1)(A), the National Academy of Sciences may contract with 1 or more engineering or rail experts, as appropriate, that— are not railroad carriers, entities funded by such carriers, or entities directly impacted by the final rule issued on May 8, 2015, entitled Enhanced Tank Car Standards and Operational Controls for High-Hazard Flammable Trains (80 Fed. Reg. 26643); and have relevant experience in conducting railroad safety technology tests or similar crash tests.
In completing the testing under paragraph (1), the National Academy of Sciences and each contractor described in paragraph
(2)shall ensure that the testing objectively, accurately, and reliably measures the performance of ECP brake systems relative to other braking technologies or systems, such as distributed power and 2-way end-of-train devices, including differences in— the number of cars derailed; the number of cars punctured; the measures of in-train forces; and the stopping distance. The Secretary shall provide funding, as part of the agreement under paragraph (1), to the National Academy of Sciences for the testing required under this section— using sums made available to carry out sections 20108 and 5118 of title 49, United States Code; and to the extent funding under subparagraph
(A)is insufficient or unavailable to fund the testing required under this section, using such sums as are necessary from the amounts appropriated to the Secretary, the Federal Railroad Administration, or the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, or a combination thereof. The National Academy of Sciences and each contractor described in paragraph
(2)may receive or use rolling stock, track, and other equipment or infrastructure from a private entity for the purposes of conducting the testing required under this section. The Secretary shall— not later than 90 days after the report date, fully incorporate and update the regulatory impact analysis of the final rule described in subsection (b)(2)(A) of the costs, benefits, and effects of the applicable ECP brake system requirements; as soon as practicable after completion of the updated analysis under subparagraph (A), solicit public comment on the analysis for a period of not more than 30 days; and not later than 60 days after the end of the public comment period under subparagraph (B), post the final updated regulatory impact analysis on the Department of Transportation’s Internet Web site. Not later than 180 days after the report date, the Secretary shall— determine, based on whether the final regulatory impact analysis described in paragraph (1)(C) demonstrates that the benefits, including safety benefits, of the applicable ECP brake system requirements exceed the costs of such requirements, whether the applicable ECP brake system requirements are justified; if the applicable ECP brake system requirements are justified, publish in the Federal Register the determination and reasons for such determination; and if the Secretary does not publish the determination under subparagraph (B), repeal the applicable ECP brake system requirements. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the Secretary from implementing the final rule described under subsection (b)(2)(A) prior to the determination required under subsection (c)(2) of this section, or require the Secretary to promulgate a new rulemaking on the provisions of such final rule, other than the applicable ECP brake system requirements, if the Secretary determines that the applicable ECP brake system requirements are not justified pursuant to this subsection. In this section, the following definitions apply: The term applicable ECP brake system requirements means sections 174.310(a)(3)(ii), 174.310(a)(3)(iii), 174.310(a)(5)(v), 179.202–12(g), and 179.202–13(i) of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, and any other regulation in effect on the date of enactment of this Act requiring the installation of ECP brakes or operation in ECP brake mode. The term Class 3 flammable liquid has the meaning given the term flammable liquid in section 173.120(a) of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. The term ECP means electronically controlled pneumatic when applied to a brake or brakes. The term ECP brake mode includes any operation of a rail car or an entire train using an ECP brake system. The term ECP brake system means a train power braking system actuated by compressed air and controlled by electronic signals from the locomotive or an ECP–EOT to the cars in the consist for service and emergency applications in which the brake pipe is used to provide a constant supply of compressed air to the reservoirs on each car but does not convey braking signals to the car. The term ECP brake system includes dual mode and stand-alone ECP brake systems. The term railroad carrier has the meaning given the term in section 20102 of title 49, United States Code. The term report date means the date that the reports under subsections (a)(3) and (b)(1)(B) are required to be transmitted pursuant to those subsections.
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 80 FR 26643
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 7013
Study and testing of electronically controlled pneumatic brakes
Fed. Reg.80 FR 26643
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.