Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 114th Congress · H.R. 1735 (EAS) — 114 HR 1735 EAS: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 · Sec. 233

Sec. 233. Demonstration of Persistent Close Air Support capabilities

268 words·~1 min read·/bill/114/hr/1735/eas/section-233·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The Secretary of the Air Force, the Secretary of the Army, and the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency shall jointly conduct a demonstration of the Persistent Close Air Support
(PCAS)capability in fiscal year 2016. As part of the demonstration required by subsection (a), the Secretary of the Air Force shall select and equip at least two aircraft for use in the demonstration that the Secretary otherwise intends to use for close air support, as identified by the United States Air Force Close Air Support Forum. The demonstration required by subsection
(a)shall include close air support operations that involve the following: Multiple tactical radio networks representing diverse ground force user communities. Two-way digital exchanges of situational awareness data, video, and calls for fire between aircraft and ground users without modification to aircraft operational flight profiles. Real-time sharing of blue force, aircraft, and target location data to reduce risks of fratricide. Lightweight digital tools based on commercial-off-the-shelf technology for pilots and joint tactical air controllers. Operations in simple and complex operating environments. The Secretary of the Air Force, the Secretary of the Army, and the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency shall jointly— assess the effect of the capabilities demonstrated as part of the demonstration required by subsection
(a)on— the time required to conduct close air support operations; the effectiveness of blue force in achieving tactical objectives; and the risk of fratricide and collateral damage; and estimate the costs that would be incurred in transitioning the technology used in the Persistent Close Air Support capability to the Army and the Air Force.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.