Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 113th Congress · S. 334 (Introduced in Senate) — To terminate agricultural direct payments beginning with the 2013 crop year. · Sec. 1

Sec. 1. Findings and sense of Congress

395 words·~2 min read·/bill/113/s/334/is/section-1

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Congress finds that— on September 30, 2012, the final day of the 2012 fiscal year, the total public debt outstanding equaled more than $16,000,000,000,000; the Congressional Budget Office projects that under law in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act, the budget deficit for fiscal year 2013 will be $845,000,000,000; the most recent projection from the Department of Agriculture, updated in February 2013, forecast— net farm income to be $112,000,000,000 in 2012, the second-highest total on record; and farm asset values, reflecting expectations of long-term profitability, to rise to a record $2,536,000,000,000; direct payments to agricultural producers— cost the Federal Government nearly $5,000,000,000 annually; are fixed payments with no connection to market conditions or the actual losses of the producers; and are not reduced or adjusted in any way in response to high commodity prices or high farm incomes; direct payments that are set based on historical acreage and yield are payable even to people who do not farm and to agricultural producers who do not grow the covered commodity for which the direct payments are made; direct payments are paid to producers on less than 22 percent of all farms in the United States and only for a select number of commodities; among producers on farms that receive direct payments, the payments are concentrated among producers on the largest farm operations, which are those least likely to need support; more than 51 percent of payments flow to just 10 percent of recipients; and more than 73 percent of payments flow to just 25 percent of recipients; direct payments were— enacted through the Agricultural Market Transition Act ( 7 U.S.C. 7201 et seq. ), title I of the 1996 Farm Bill; and intended to be temporary, transitional payments to assist agricultural producers following the elimination of target price deficiency payments; but the transition was never completed and direct payments were reauthorized in 2002 and 2008; and direct payments were eliminated by— S. 3240 (112th Congress), the Agriculture Reform, Food, and Jobs Act of 2012, which passed the Senate on June 21, 2012; and H.R. 6083 (112th Congress), the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2012, which was reported by the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives on September 13, 2012.
It is the sense of Congress that direct payments— are unnecessary and unaffordable; and should be immediately repealed.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1
Findings and sense of Congress
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.