Sec. 2. Enforcement authority relating to non-licensee robocallers
262 words·~1 min read·
/bill/113/s/3010/is/section-2A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Section 503(b)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(5) ) is amended in the second sentence— by striking or in the case of and inserting in the case of ; and by inserting before the period at the end the following: , or if the person involved is engaging in violations of section 227(b)(1) of this title . Section 503(b)(6)(B) of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(6)(B) ) is amended— by striking occurred more than 1 year and inserting the following: occurred— except as provided in clause (ii), more than 1 year ; by striking liability. and inserting liability; or ; and by inserting after clause (i), as designated, the following: in the case of a violation of section 227(b)(1) of this title, more than 3 years prior to the date of issuance of the required notice of apparent liability. .
Section 503(b)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 ( 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(2) ) is amended— in subparagraph (D), by striking or
(C)and inserting (C), (F), or
(G); and by adding at the end the following: If the violator does not hold, and is not an applicant for, a license, permit, certificate, or other authorization issued by the Commission— the amount of any forfeiture penalty determined under this subsection for a violation of section 227(b)(1) of this title shall not exceed $25,000 for each violation or each day of a continuing violation; and there shall be no limit on the total amount assessed for any continuing violation of section 227(b)(1) of this title. .
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
U.S. Code
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
Enforcement authority relating to non-licensee robocallers
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources