Sec. 401. Evaluation by Government Accountability Office
611 words·~3 min read·
/bill/113/s/2999/is/section-401A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Not later than October 1, 2015, the Comptroller General of the United States shall— conduct a comprehensive analysis and evaluation regarding the performance of the Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention (referred to in this section as the agency ), its functions, its programs, and its grants; conduct a comprehensive audit and evaluation of a selected, statistically significant sample of grantees (as determined by the Comptroller General) that receive Federal funds under grant programs administered by the Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention including a review of internal controls to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse of funds by grantees; and submit a report in accordance with subsection (d).
In conducting the analysis and evaluation under subsection (a)(1), and in order to document the efficiency and public benefit of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5601 et seq. ), excluding the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act ( 42 U.S.C. 5701 et seq. ) and the Missing Children’s Assistance Act ( 42 U.S.C. 5771 et seq. ), the Comptroller General shall take into consideration— the extent to which the jurisdiction of, and the programs administered by, the agency duplicate or conflict with the jurisdiction and programs of other agencies; the potential benefits of consolidating programs administered by the agency with similar or duplicative programs of other agencies, and the potential for consolidating those programs; whether present functions or operations are impeded or enhanced by existing statutes, rules, and procedures; the number and types of beneficiaries or persons served by programs carried out by the agency; the manner with which the agency seeks public input and input from State and local governments on the performance of the functions of the agency; the extent to which the agency complies with section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the Freedom of Information Act); whether greater oversight is needed of programs developed with grants made by the agency; and the extent to which changes are necessary in the authorizing statutes of the agency in order for the functions of the agency to be performed in a more efficient and effective manner.
In conducting the audit and evaluation under subsection (a)(2), and in order to document the efficiency and public benefit of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 ( 42 U.S.C. 5601 et seq. ), excluding the Runaway and Homeless Youth Act ( 42 U.S.C. 5701 et seq. ) and the Missing Children’s Assistance Act ( 42 U.S.C. 5771 et seq. ), the Comptroller General shall take into consideration— whether grantees timely file Financial Status Reports; whether grantees have sufficient internal controls to ensure adequate oversight of grant fund received; whether disbursements were accompanied with adequate supporting documentation (including invoices and receipts); whether expenditures were authorized; whether subrecipients of grant funds were complying with program requirements; whether salaries and fringe benefits of personnel were adequately supported by documentation; whether contracts were bid in accordance with program guidelines; and whether grant funds were spent in accordance with program goals and guidelines.
The Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report regarding the evaluation conducted under subsection
(a)and audit under subsection (b), together with supporting materials, to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, and be made available to the public, not later than October 1, 2011. The report submitted in accordance with paragraph
(1)shall include all audit findings determined by the selected, statistically significant sample of grantees as required by subsection (a)(2) and shall include the name and location of any selected grantee as well as any findings required by subsection (a)(2).
Connectionstraces to 3
Traces to 3 documents
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources