Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 113th Congress · S. 2611 (Introduced in Senate) — To facilitate the expedited processing of minors entering the United States across the southern border and for other... · Sec. 203

Sec. 203. Strategy to achieve situational awareness and operational control of the border

2,574 words·~12 min read·/bill/113/s/2611/is/section-203

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit, to the appropriate congressional committees, a comprehensive strategy for— gaining and maintaining situational awareness and operational control of high traffic areas not later than 2 years after the date of the submission of the implementation plan required under subsection (c); and gaining and maintaining operational control along the Southwest border of the United States not later than 5 years after such date of submission. The strategy required under subsection
(a)shall include a consideration of the following: An assessment of principal border security threats, including threats relating to the smuggling and trafficking of humans, weapons, and illicit drugs. Efforts to analyze and disseminate border security and border threat information between the border security components of the Department of Homeland Security and with other appropriate Federal departments and agencies with missions associated with the border. Efforts to increase situational awareness, in accordance with privacy, civil liberties, and civil rights protections, including— surveillance capabilities developed or utilized by the Department of Defense, including any technology determined to be excess by the Department of Defense; and use of manned aircraft and unmanned aerial systems, including camera and sensor technology deployed on such assets. Efforts to detect and prevent terrorists and instruments of terrorism from entering the United States. Efforts to ensure that any new border security technology can be operationally integrated with existing technologies in use by the Department of Homeland Security. An assessment of existing efforts and technologies used for border security and the effect of such efforts and technologies on civil rights, private property rights, privacy rights, and civil liberties. Technology required to maintain, support, and enhance security and facilitate trade at ports of entry, including nonintrusive detection equipment, radiation detection equipment, biometric technology, surveillance systems, and other sensors and technology that the Secretary of Homeland Security determines to be necessary. Operational coordination of the border security components of the Department of Homeland Security. Lessons learned from Operation Jumpstart and Operation Phalanx. Cooperative agreements and information sharing with State, local, tribal, territorial, and other Federal law enforcement agencies that have jurisdiction on the northern or southern borders, or in the maritime environment. Border security information received from consultation with— State, local, tribal, and Federal law enforcement agencies that have jurisdiction on the northern or southern border, or in the maritime environment; and border community stakeholders (including through public meetings with such stakeholders), including representatives from border agricultural and ranching organizations and representatives from business and civic organizations along the northern or southern border. Agreements with foreign governments that support the border security efforts of the United States, including coordinated installation of standardized land border inspection technology, such as license plate readers and RFID readers. Staffing requirements for all border security functions. A prioritized list of research and development objectives to enhance the security of the international land and maritime borders of the United States. An assessment of training programs, including training programs regarding— identifying and detecting fraudulent documents; protecting the civil, constitutional, human, and privacy rights of individuals; understanding the scope of enforcement authorities and the use of force policies; screening, identifying, and addressing vulnerable populations, such as children and victims of human trafficking; and social and cultural sensitivity toward border communities. Local crime indices of municipalities and counties along the southern border. An assessment of how border security operations affect crossing times. Resources and other measures that are necessary to achieve a 50-percent reduction in the average wait times of commercial and passenger vehicles at international land ports of entry along the southern border and the northern border. Metrics required under subsections (e), (f), and (g). Not later than 90 days after the submission of the strategy required under subsection (a), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit, to the appropriate congressional committees and to the Government Accountability Office, an implementation plan for each of the border security components of the Department of Homeland Security to carry out such strategy. The implementation plan required under paragraph
(1)shall— specify what protections will be put in place to ensure that staffing and resources necessary for the maintenance of operations at ports of entry are not diverted to the detriment of such operations in favor of operations between ports of entry; and include— an integrated master schedule and cost estimate, including lifecycle costs, for the activities contained in such implementation plan; and a comprehensive border security technology plan to improve surveillance capabilities that includes— a documented justification and rationale for technology choices; deployment locations; fixed versus mobile assets; a timetable for procurement and deployment; estimates of operation and maintenance costs; an identification of any impediments to the deployment of such technologies; and estimates of the relative cost effectiveness of various border security strategies and operations, including— the deployment of personnel and technology; and the construction of new physical and virtual barriers. Not later than 90 days after receiving the implementation plan in accordance with paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit an assessment of such plan to the appropriate congressional committees a report on such plan. Not later than 180 days after the submission of each Quadrennial Homeland Security Review required under section 707 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 ( 6 U.S.C. 347 ) beginning with the first such Review that is due after the implementation plan is submitted under subsection (c), the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit, to the appropriate congressional committees, an updated— strategy under subsection (a); and implementation plan under subsection (c). Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement metrics, informed by situational awareness, to measure the effectiveness of security between ports of entry, including— an illegal border crossing effectiveness rate, informed by situational awareness; an illicit drugs seizure rate, which measures the amount and type of illicit drugs seized by the Border Patrol in any fiscal year compared to an average of the amount and type of illicit drugs seized by the Border Patrol for the immediately preceding 5 fiscal years; a cocaine seizure effectiveness rate, which shall be measured by calculating the percentage of the total documented cocaine flow rate (as contained in Federal drug databases) that is seized by the Border Patrol; estimates, using alternative methodologies, including recidivism data, survey data, known-flow data, and technologically measured data, of— total attempted illegal border crossings; total deaths and injuries resulting from such attempted illegal border crossings; the rate of apprehension of attempted illegal border crossers; and the inflow into the United States of illegal border crossers who evade apprehension; and estimates of the impact of the Border Patrol’s Consequence Delivery System on the rate of recidivism of illegal border crossers. Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement metrics, informed by situational awareness, to measure the effectiveness of security at ports of entry, which shall include— an inadmissible border crossing rate, which measures the number of known inadmissible border crossers who are apprehended, excluding those border crossers who voluntarily withdraw their applications for admission, against the total estimated number of inadmissible border crossers U.S. Customs and Border Protection fails to apprehend; an illicit drugs seizure rate, which measures the amount and type of illicit drugs seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in any fiscal year compared to an average of the amount and type of illicit drugs seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the immediately preceding 5 fiscal years; a cocaine seizure effectiveness rate, which shall be measured by calculating the percentage of the total documented cocaine flow rate (as contained in Federal drug databases) that is seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection; estimates, using alternative methodologies, including survey data and randomized secondary screening data, of— total attempted inadmissible border crossers; the rate of apprehension of attempted inadmissible border crossers; and the inflow into the United States of inadmissible border crossers who evade apprehension; the number of infractions related to personnel and cargo committed by major violators who are apprehended by U.S. Customs and Border Protection at ports of entry, and the estimated number of such infractions committed by major violators who are not so apprehended; and a measurement of how border security operations affect crossing times. The Inspector General of the Department of Homeland Security shall carry out covert testing at ports of entry and submit to the Secretary of Homeland Security and the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains the results of such testing. The Secretary shall use such results to inform activities under this subsection. Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall implement metrics, informed by situational awareness, to measure the effectiveness of security in the maritime environment, which shall include— an estimate of the total number of undocumented migrants the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components fail to interdict; an undocumented migrant interdiction rate, which measures the number of undocumented migrants interdicted against the total estimated number of undocumented migrants the Department of Homeland Security’s maritime security components fail to interdict; an illicit drugs removal rate, which measures the amount and type of illicit drugs removed by the maritime security components of the Department of Homeland Security inside a transit zone in any fiscal year compared to an average of the amount and type of illicit drugs removed by such components inside a transit zone for the immediately preceding 5 fiscal years; an illicit drugs removal rate, which measures the amount of illicit drugs removed by the maritime security components of the Department of Homeland Security outside a transit zone in any fiscal year compared to an average of the amount of illicit drugs removed by such components outside a transit zone for the immediately preceding 5 fiscal years; a cocaine removal effectiveness rate inside a transit zone; a cocaine removal effectiveness rate outside a transit zone; and a response rate which measures the Department of Homeland Security’s ability to respond to and resolve known maritime threats, both inside and outside a transit zone, by placing assets on-scene, compared to the total number of events with respect to which the Department has known threat information. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall collaborate with the head of a national laboratory within the Department of Homeland Security laboratory network with expertise in border security and the head of a border security university-based center within the Department of Homeland Security centers of excellence network to develop, and ensure the suitability and statistical validity of, the metrics required under subsections (e), (f), and (g). In carrying out paragraph (1), the head of the national laboratory and the head of a border security university-based center shall make recommendations to the Secretary of Homeland Security for other suitable metrics that may be used to measure the effectiveness of border security. In addition to the collaboration described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall also consult with the Governors of every border State and the representatives of the Border Patrol and U.S. Customs and Border Protection regarding the development of the metrics required under subsections (e), (f), and (g). The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide the Government Accountability Office with the data and methodology used to develop the metrics implemented under subsections (e), (f), and (g). Not later than 270 days after receiving the data and methodology referred to in paragraph (1), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees on the suitability and statistical validity of such data and methodology. If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that situational awareness and operational control of high traffic areas have been achieved not later than 2 years after the date of the submission of the implementation plan required under subsection (c), the Secretary shall submit an attestation of such achievement to the appropriate congressional committees and the Comptroller General of the United States. If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that operational control along the southwest border of the United States has been achieved not later than 5 years after the date of the submission of the implementation plan required under subsection (c), the Secretary shall submit an attestation of such achievement to the appropriate congressional committees and the Comptroller General of the United States. Every year beginning with the year after the Secretary of Homeland Security submits the attestation under subparagraph (B), if the Secretary determines that operational control along the southwest border of the United States is being maintained, the Secretary shall submit an attestation of such maintenance to the appropriate congressional committees and the Comptroller General of the United States. The Comptroller General of the United States shall review and assess the attestations of the Secretary of Homeland Security under subparagraphs (A), (B), and
(C)of paragraph (1). Not later than 120 days after conducting the reviews described in subparagraph (A), the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report on the results of each such review to the appropriate congressional committees. If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the case may be, has not been achieved by the dates referred to in subparagraphs
(A)and
(B)of subsection (j)(1), as the case may be, or if the Secretary determines that operational control is not being annually maintained pursuant to subparagraph
(C)of such subsection, the Secretary shall, not later than 60 days after such dates, submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that— describes why situational awareness or operational control, or both, as the case may be, was not achieved; and includes a description of impediments incurred, potential remedies, and recommendations to achieve situational awareness, operational control, or both, as the case may be. Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that addresses— areas of overlap in responsibilities within the border security functions of the Department of Homeland Security; and the relative cost effectiveness of border security strategies, including deployment of additional personnel and technology, and construction of virtual and physical barriers. Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that contains— a resource allocation model for current and future year staffing requirements that includes— optimal staffing levels at all land, air, and sea ports of entry; and an explanation of U.S. Customs and Border Protection methodology for aligning staffing levels and workload to threats and vulnerabilities and their effects on cross border trade and passenger travel across all mission areas; detailed information on the level of manpower available at all land, air, and sea ports of entry and between ports of entry, including the number of canine and agricultural specialists assigned to each such port of entry; detailed information that describes the difference between the staffing the model suggests and the actual staffing at each port of entry and between the ports of entry; and detailed information that examines the security impacts and competitive impacts of entering into a reimbursement agreement with foreign governments for U.S. Customs and Border Protection preclearance facilities.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 203
Strategy to achieve situational awareness and operational control of the border
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.