Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 113th Congress · S. 2177 (Introduced in Senate) — To establish an Office of Forensic Science and a Forensic Science Board, to strengthen and promote confidence in the... · Sec. 401

Sec. 401. Research strategy and priorities

429 words·~2 min read·/bill/113/s/2177/is/section-401

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Board shall recommend to the Director a comprehensive strategy for fostering and improving peer-reviewed scientific research relating to the forensic science disciplines, including research addressing issues of validity, reliability, and accuracy in the forensic science disciplines. After the Director receives recommendations from the Board under paragraph (1), the Director shall, in accordance with section 101(f)(3), establish a comprehensive strategy for fostering and improving peer-reviewed scientific research relating to the forensic science disciplines.
Not less frequently than once every 5 years, the Board shall— review the comprehensive strategy established under paragraph (2); and recommend any necessary updates to the comprehensive strategy. After the Director receives recommendations from the Board under subparagraph (A), the Director shall, in accordance with section 101(f)(3), update the comprehensive strategy as necessary and appropriate. Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Board shall recommend to the Director a list of priorities for forensic science research funding.
After the Director receives the list from the Board under paragraph (1), the Director shall, in accordance with section 101(f)(3), establish a list of priorities for forensic science research funding. Not less frequently than once every 2 years, the Board shall— review— the list of priorities established under paragraph (2); and the findings of the relevant Committees made under subsection (c); and recommend any necessary updates to the list of priorities, incorporating, as appropriate, the findings of the Committees under subsection (c).
After the Director receives the recommendations under paragraph (3), the Director shall, in accordance with section 101(f)(3), update as necessary the list of research funding priorities. Not later than 2 years after the date on which all members of a Committee have been appointed under section 103, and periodically thereafter, the Committee shall— examine and evaluate the scientific research in each forensic science discipline within the responsibility of the Committee; conduct comprehensive surveys of scientific research relating to each forensic science discipline within the responsibility of the Committee; examine the research needs in each forensic science discipline within the responsibility of the Committee and identify key areas in which further scientific research is needed; and develop and submit to the Board a list of research needs and priorities.
In developing the initial research strategy, research priorities, and surveys required under this section, the Board and the Director shall consider any findings, surveys, and analyses relating to research in forensic science disciplines, including those made by the Subcommittee on Forensic Science of the National Science and Technology Council.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.