Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 113th Congress · H.R. 4376 (Introduced in House) — To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify safe harbor requirements applicable to automatic contribution ar... · Sec. 4

Sec. 4. Secure deferral arrangements

501 words·~2 min read·/bill/113/hr/4376/ih/section-4

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Subsection
(k)of section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: A secure deferral arrangement shall be treated as meeting the requirements of paragraph (3)(A)(ii). For purposes of this paragraph, the term secure deferral arrangement means any cash or deferred arrangement which meets the requirements of subparagraphs (C), (D), and
(E)of paragraph (13), except as modified by this paragraph. For purposes of this paragraph, with respect to any employee, the term qualified percentage means, in lieu of the meaning given such term in paragraph (13)(C)(iii), any percentage determined under the arrangement if such percentage is applied uniformly and is— at least 6 percent, but not greater than 10 percent, during the period ending on the last day of the first plan year which begins after the date on which the first elective contribution described in paragraph (13)(C)(i) is made with respect to such employee, at least 8 percent during the first plan year following the plan year described in clause (i), and at least 10 percent during any subsequent plan year. For purposes of this paragraph, an arrangement shall be treated as having met the requirements of paragraph (13)(D)(i) if and only if the employer makes matching contributions on behalf of each employee who is not a highly compensated employee in an amount equal to the sum of— 100 percent of the elective contributions of the employee to the extent that such contributions do not exceed 1 percent of compensation, 50 percent of so much of such contributions as exceed 1 percent but do not exceed 6 percent of compensation, plus 25 percent of so much of such contributions as exceed 6 percent but do not exceed 10 percent of compensation. The rules of clause
(ii)of paragraph (12)(B) and clauses
(iii)and
(iv)of paragraph (13)(D) shall apply for purposes of clause
(i)but the rule of clause
(iii)of paragraph (12)(B) shall not apply for such purposes. The rate of matching contribution for each incremental deferral must be at least as high as the rate specified in clause (i), and may be higher, so long as such rate does not increase as an employee’s rate of elective contributions increases. . Subsection
(m)of section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating paragraph
(13)as paragraph
(14)and by inserting after paragraph
(12)the following new paragraph: A defined contribution plan shall be treated as meeting the requirements of paragraph
(2)with respect to matching contributions and employee contributions if the plan— is a secure deferral arrangement (as defined in subsection (k)(14)), meets the requirements of clauses
(ii)and
(iii)of paragraph (11)(B), and provides that matching contributions on behalf of any employee may not be made with respect to an employee’s contributions or elective deferrals in excess of 10 percent of the employee’s compensation. . The amendments made by this section shall apply to plan years beginning after December 31, 2014.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.