Sec. 112. Retrospective analysis of existing Federal regulations
236 words·~1 min read·
/bill/113/hr/4/pcs/section-112A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 ( Public Law 104–4 ; 2 U.S.C. 1511 et seq. ) is amended— by redesignating section 209 as section 210; and by inserting after section 208 the following new section 209: At the request of the chairman or ranking minority member of a standing or select committee of the House of Representatives or the Senate, an agency shall conduct a retrospective analysis of an existing Federal regulation promulgated by an agency. Each agency conducting a retrospective analysis of existing Federal regulations pursuant to subsection
(a)shall submit to the chairman of the relevant committee, Congress, and the Comptroller General a report containing, with respect to each Federal regulation covered by the analysis— a copy of the Federal regulation; the continued need for the Federal regulation; the nature of comments or complaints received concerning the Federal regulation from the public since the Federal regulation was promulgated; the extent to which the Federal regulation overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal regulations, and, to the extent feasible, with State and local governmental rules; the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the Federal regulation; a complete analysis of the retrospective direct costs and benefits of the Federal regulation that considers studies done outside the Federal Government (if any) estimating such costs or benefits; and any litigation history challenging the Federal regulation. .
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
U.S. Code
1 reference not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 104-4
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources