Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 113th Congress · H.R. 3979 (EAH) — 113 HR 3979 EAH: Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘Buck’ McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 · Sec. 1628

Sec. 1628. Personnel security and insider threat

402 words·~2 min read·/bill/113/hr/3979/eah/section-1628

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Not later than March 30, 2015, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the plans of the Department to address— the adoption of an interim capability to continuously evaluate the security status of the employees and contractors of the Department who have been determined eligible for and granted access to classified information by the Department of Defense Central Adjudication Facilities; the use of an interim system to assist in developing requirements, lessons learned, business rules, privacy standards, and operational concepts applicable to the objective automated records checks and continuous evaluation capability required by the strategy for modernizing personnel security; the engineering for an interim system and the objective automated records checks and continuous evaluation capability for initial investigations and reinvestigations required by the strategy for modernizing personnel security to support automation-assisted insider threat analyses conducted across the law enforcement, personnel security, human resources, counterintelligence, physical security, network behavior monitoring, and cybersecurity activities of all the components of the Department of Defense, pursuant to Executive Order 13587; how competitive processes and open systems designs will be used to acquire advanced commercial technologies throughout the life cycle of the objective continuous evaluation capability required by the strategy for modernizing personnel security; how the senior agency official in the Department of Defense for insider threat detection and prevention will be supported by experts in counterintelligence, personnel security, law enforcement, human resources, physical security, network monitoring, cybersecurity, and privacy and civil liberties from relevant components of the Department and experts in information technology, large-scale data analysis, systems engineering, and program acquisition; how the senior agency official, in developing the integrated, automation-assisted insider threat capability, will be supported by— the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics; the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense; and the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness; and who will be responsible and accountable for managing the development and fielding of the automation-assisted insider threat capability.
The report required under subsection
(a)shall include specific gaps in policy and statute to address the requirements placed on the Department by section 907(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 ( Public Law 113–66 ) and Executive Order 13587. In this section, the term strategy for modernizing personnel security means the strategy developed under section 907(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 ( Public Law 113–66 ).
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 1628
Personnel security and insider threat
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.