Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 113th Congress · H.R. 2881 (Introduced in House) — To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase the amount of loan forgiveness available to highly qualified te... · Sec. 2

Sec. 2. Additional loan forgiveness for highly qualified teachers employed in a low-income school in the same local educational agency for 5 consecutive years

446 words·~2 min read·/bill/113/hr/2881/ih/section-2

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Section 428J(c) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1078–10(c) ) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: Notwithstanding the amount specified in paragraph (1), the aggregate amount that the Secretary shall repay under this section shall be not more than $17,500 in the case of an elementary or secondary school teacher— who meets the requirements of subsection (b); and who has been employed as a full-time teacher for 5 consecutive complete school years at the same local educational agency.
A loan made under section 428B (other than an excepted PLUS loan) shall be considered a qualified loan amount for purposes of this paragraph. Notwithstanding paragraph (2), a loan amount for a loan made under section 428C may be a qualified loan amount for the purposes of this paragraph only to the extent that such loan amount was used to repay a Federal Direct Stafford Loan, a Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loan, a Federal Direct PLUS Loan (other than an excepted PLUS loan), or a loan made under section 428, 428B (other than an excepted PLUS loan), or 428H for a borrower who meets the requirements of subparagraph (A), as determined in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
In this paragraph, the term excepted PLUS loan has the meaning given the term in section 493C(a). . Section 460(c) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1087j(c) ) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph: Notwithstanding the amount specified in paragraph (1), the aggregate amount that the Secretary shall cancel under this section shall be not more than $17,500 in the case of an elementary or secondary school teacher— who meets the requirements of subsection (b); and who has been employed as a full-time teacher for 5 consecutive complete school years at the same local educational agency.
A Federal Direct PLUS Loan (other than an excepted PLUS loan) shall be considered a qualified loan amount for purposes of this paragraph. Notwithstanding paragraph (2), a loan amount for a Federal Direct Consolidation Loan may be a qualified loan amount for the purposes of this paragraph only to the extent that such loan amount was used to repay a Federal Direct Stafford Loan, a Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loan, a Federal Direct PLUS Loan (other than an excepted PLUS loan), or a loan made under section 428, 428B (other than an excepted PLUS loan), or 428H for a borrower who meets the requirements of subparagraph (A), as determined in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
In this paragraph, the term excepted PLUS loan has the meaning given the term in section 493C(a). .
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 20 USC 1078–10(c)
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 2
Additional loan forgiveness for highly qualified teachers employed in a low-income school in the same local educational agency for 5 consecutive years
Cite20 USC 1078–10(c)
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.