Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · BILL · 113th Congress · H.R. 1365 (Introduced in House) — To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to reaffirm the United States historic commitment to protecting refugees... · Sec. 13

Sec. 13. Study on the effect of expedited removal provisions, practices, and procedures on asylum claims

463 words·~2 min read·/bill/113/hr/1365/ih/section-13

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (referred to in this section as the Commission ) is authorized to conduct a study to determine whether immigration officers described in paragraph
(2)are engaging in conduct described in paragraph (3). An immigration officer described in this paragraph is an immigration officer performing duties under section 235(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1225(b) ) with respect to aliens who— are apprehended after entering the United States; and may be eligible to apply for asylum under section 208 or 235 of such Act. An immigration officer engages in conduct described in this paragraph if the immigration officer— improperly encourages an alien referred to in paragraph
(2)to withdraw or retract claims for asylum; incorrectly fails to refer such an alien for an interview by an asylum officer to determine whether the alien has a credible fear of persecution (as defined in section 235(b)(1)(B)(v) of such Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(B)(v) )); incorrectly removes such an alien to a country in which the alien may be persecuted; or detains such an alien improperly or under inappropriate conditions. Not later than 2 years after the date on which the Commission initiates the study under subsection (a), the Commission shall submit a report containing the results of the study to— the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate ; the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate ; the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate ; the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives ; the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives ; and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives . The Commission may identify employees of the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice, and the Government Accountability Office that have significant expertise and knowledge of refugee and asylum issues. At the request of the Commission, the Secretary, the Attorney General, and the Comptroller General of the United States shall authorize staff identified under subparagraph
(A)to assist the Commission in conducting the study under subsection (a). The Commission may hire additional staff and consultants to conduct the study under subsection (a). Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the Secretary and the Attorney General shall provide staff designated under paragraph
(1)or hired under paragraph
(2)with unrestricted access to all stages of all proceedings conducted under section 235(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. 1225(b) ). The Secretary and the Attorney General may not permit unrestricted access under subparagraph
(A)if— the alien subject to a proceeding under such section 235(b) objects to such access; or the Secretary or Attorney General determines that the security of a particular proceeding would be threatened by such access.
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 13
Study on the effect of expedited removal provisions, practices, and procedures on asylum claims
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.