Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Arizona · Title 42 — Public Utilities and Carriers and Energy Programs

42-13205. Valuation method applied on appeal

304 words·~1 min read·/az/title-42/42-13205

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

On appeal of a valuation determined by the income method pursuant to section 42-13204 or an appeal in which the owner has elected the income method pursuant to section 42-13203, subsection D, the valuation of a shopping center shall be determined by whichever one of the following valuation methods most closely approximates fair market value:
1. The income method commonly known as the straight line building residual method pursuant to section 42-13203, subsection D. If the reviewing body finds that other information that is customarily analyzed under the income method must be used to properly apply the income method to the property, it may use the other information to supplement information provided by the owner if:
(a)The credible and accurate information provided by the owner remains the primary basis for the valuation under the income method.
(b)The supplementary information is credible, is derived from properties or circumstances that are substantially comparable to the property and is valid under the income method.
(c)The reviewing body specifies in its written order what other information was considered, the manner in which it was applied and the change in the valuation under the income method, if any, resulting from the use of the supplementary information.
2. The replacement cost less depreciation method pursuant to section 42-13203.
3. The market comparison method, if a sale of the subject property occurred within two years before the date of valuation and no material change to the property, its lease terms, tenants or occupancy rates or any other material fact has occurred since the sale. If the market comparison method is applicable, the reviewing body may consider information on sales of other properties that occurred within two years before the date of valuation and that are determined to be comparable to the subject property by clear and convincing evidence.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.