Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Arizona · Title 38 — Public Land

38-1117. Law enforcement officer investigation and discipline committee, board, agency, department, office, entity or person; membership; qualifications; exceptions; statewide concern; definition

477 words·~2 min read·/az/title-38/38-1117

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

A. Notwithstanding any other law, at least two-thirds of the members, staff, employees or seats of any government committee, board, agency, department, office or entity that investigates law enforcement officer misconduct, influences the conduct of or certifies law enforcement officer misconduct investigations, recommends disciplinary actions for law enforcement officer misconduct or imposes discipline for law enforcement officer misconduct must be Arizona peace officer standards and training board certified law enforcement officers who are of any rank and who are from the same department or agency as the law enforcement officer who is the subject of the investigation or disciplinary action.
B. Any findings or recommendations from any government committee, board, agency, department, office or entity shall require a majority vote to do any of the following:
1. Investigate law enforcement officer misconduct.
2. Influence the conduct of or certify law enforcement officer misconduct investigations.
3. Recommend disciplinary actions for law enforcement officer misconduct.
4. Impose discipline for law enforcement officer misconduct.
C. If the person or government committee, board, agency, department, office or entity does not meet the two-thirds requirement prescribed in subsection A of this section, a supervisor, a department or an agency head that supervises a law enforcement officer may investigate and impose discipline for the law enforcement officer's misconduct if the supervisor, department or agency head acts independently of the person, committee, board, agency, department, office or entity.
D. This section does not apply to any of the following:
1. A person or a government committee, board, agency, department, office, civil service board or entity that only reviews the actions described in subsection A of this section and that does not determine the initial level of discipline or have the authority to increase the severity of the disciplinary action.
2. The Arizona peace officer standards and training board.
3. A multijurisdictional law enforcement agency or task force or a similar entity that is charged with investigating the use of force by law enforcement officers, if at least two-thirds of the membership of the multijurisdictional law enforcement agency or task force or the similar entity consists of Arizona peace officer standards and training board certified law enforcement officers.
4. An entity that investigates federal employment discrimination.
E. The legislature finds that setting and maintaining standards of professionalism and integrity of law enforcement officers in this state are of statewide concern.
F. For the purposes of this section, "members, staff, employees or seats":
1. Includes any person who participates in the following:
(a)Investigating law enforcement officer misconduct.
(b)Influencing the conduct or certification of law enforcement officer misconduct investigations.
(c)Recommending disciplinary actions for law enforcement officer misconduct.
(d)Imposing discipline for law enforcement officer misconduct.
2. Does not include support or administrative staff or any person who only reviews the actions of the remainder of the government committee, board, agency, department, office or entity.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.