Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Arizona · Title 36 — Public Contracts

36-441. Health care utilization committees; immunity; exception; definition

400 words·~2 min read·/az/title-36/36-441

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

A. A person who without malice makes a decision or recommendation as a member, agent or employee of a health care utilization committee or who furnishes any records, information or assistance to that committee at its request is not subject to liability for civil damages or any legal action in consequence of that action. In any such action, the absence of malice is presumed. This presumption may be overcome only by a showing of clear and convincing evidence. This section does not relieve a person of liability arising from treatment of a patient.
For the purposes of this subsection, "malice" means evil intent and outrageous, oppressive or intolerable conduct that creates a substantial risk of tremendous harm to others.
B. All proceedings, records and materials prepared in connection with the activities of a health care utilization committee are confidential and are not subject to discovery except:
1. In proceedings before the Arizona medical board or the board of osteopathic examiners.
2. In actions by an individual health care provider against the health care institution or outpatient surgical center arising from the discipline or other adverse action taken against the individual as a result of utilization review.
C. No member of a utilization review committee, person engaged in assisting the committee or person furnishing information to the committee may be subpoenaed to testify in a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding if the subpoena is based solely on the utilization review committee's activities.
D. This section does not:
1. Affect a patient's claim to privilege or privacy.
2. Prevent the subpoena of a patient's medical records if they are otherwise subject to discovery.
3. Restrict the powers and duties of the director pursuant to this chapter with respect to records and information that are not subject to this section.
E. In a legal action brought against a hospital or outpatient surgical center for failure to adequately perform utilization review, representatives of the facility may testify as to whether there was utilization review with respect to the subject matter of the litigation.
F. All proceedings, records and materials prepared in connection with utilization review are confidential and inadmissible as evidence in a court proceeding.
G. For the purposes of this section, "health care utilization committee" means a committee established by a hospital or an outpatient surgical center to review or evaluate the utilization, appropriateness and necessity of health care services provided by that facility.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.