23-491.09. Enforcement
305 words·~1 min read·
/az/title-23/23-491-09A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
A. If the division, following an inspection or investigation, determines that there is reasonable cause to believe that there is a violation of a standard or regulation, the division shall issue a correction order directing any repairs, improvements, changes or additions necessary to eliminate the hazard. Each correction order shall be in writing, delivered either by mail or in person and shall contain the following:
1. A particular description of the nature of the violation, including a reference to the provision of this article or of any standard or regulation alleged to have been violated.
2. A reasonable time for the abatement of the violation.
B. No correction order may be issued after the expiration of a period of six months from the date of the inspection or investigation which produced evidence of the violation.
C. If in the opinion of the director or the director's authorized representative the continued operation of the defective device constitutes an immediate danger to the safety of the persons operating or being conveyed by such device, the director or the director's authorized representative may condemn such device and require it to be returned to a condition allowing safe operation before its use is resumed.
D. Upon failure of an owner or operator to comply with either the requirements of a correction order issued pursuant to subsection A or condemnation pursuant to this subsection, the commission may file an action in the superior court of the county where the violation occurred to enjoin the owner or operator from engaging in further acts in violation of the requirements of the correction order or the condemnation. Any person found to be in contempt of an injunctive order of the court shall be fined not less than fifty nor more than three hundred dollars with each day of violation constituting a separate contempt.