Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · Arizona · Title 20 — Infants and Incompetents

20-2510. Health care insurers requirements; medical directors

616 words·~3 min read·/az/title-20/20-2510

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

A. A health care insurer that proposes to provide coverage of inpatient hospital and medical benefits, outpatient surgical benefits or any medical, surgical or health care service for residents of this state with utilization review of those benefits shall meet at least one of the following requirements:
1. Have a certificate issued pursuant to this chapter.
2. Be accredited by the utilization review accreditation commission, the national committee for quality assurance or any other nationally recognized accreditation process recognized by the director.
3. Contract with a utilization review agent that has a certificate issued pursuant to this chapter.
4. Contract with a utilization review agent that is accredited by the utilization review accreditation commission, the national committee for quality assurance or any other nationally recognized accreditation process recognized by the director.
5. Provide to the director a signed and notarized statement that the health care insurer has submitted an application for accreditation to the utilization review accreditation commission or the national committee for quality assurance and is awaiting completion of the accreditation review process. On completion of the accreditation review process, the insurer shall provide to the director adequate proof that the insurer has been accredited. If the insurer is denied accreditation, within sixty days after the denial the insurer shall meet at least one of the requirements set forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3 or 4 of this subsection.
B. Except as provided in subsections C, D and E of this section, any direct denial of prior authorization of a service requested by a health care provider on the basis of medical necessity by a health care insurer shall be made in writing by a medical director who holds an active unrestricted license to practice medicine in this state pursuant to title 32, chapter 13 or 17. The written denial shall include an explanation of why the treatment was denied. The health care insurer shall send a copy of the written denial to the health care provider who requested the treatment.
Health care insurers shall maintain copies of all written denials and shall make the copies available to the department for inspection during regular business hours. The medical director is responsible for all direct denials that are made on the basis of medical necessity. Nothing in this section prohibits a health care insurer from consulting with a licensed physician whose scope of practice may provide the health care insurer with a more thorough review of the medical necessity.
C. For determinations made pursuant to subsection B of this section, a dental service corporation as defined in section 20-822 or a prepaid dental plan organization as defined in section 20-1001 may use as a medical director either:
1. An individual who holds an active unrestricted license to practice dentistry in this state pursuant to title 32, chapter 11.
2. A physician who holds an active unrestricted license to practice medicine in this state pursuant to title 32, chapter 13 or 17.
D. For determinations made pursuant to subsection B of this section, an optometric service corporation may use as a medical director either:
1. An individual who holds an active unrestricted license to practice optometry in this state pursuant to title 32, chapter 16.
2. A physician who holds an active unrestricted license to practice medicine in this state pursuant to title 32, chapter 13 or 17.
E. For determinations made pursuant to subsection B of this section, a health care insurer shall use a chiropractor licensed in this state pursuant to title 32, chapter 8 or by any regulatory board in another state to review any direct denial of prior authorization of a chiropractic service requested by a chiropractor on the basis of medical necessity.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.